SITREP №1 - Operation "Transparency"

News
339

Sir, your post is awesome, except this part.

This looks bad if it is per-map voting. That is totally missing the point of the preferred maps system for me.

My problem: how will I tell the system in 3-5 clicks

  • that today I’m in the mood to play Tunisia, Moscow or Japanese/Burma maps but nothing else?
  • and that tomorrow I wish to skip Moscow maps but play anything else because yesterday it was too much?
  • or that after this neverending and boring match I’m fed up with the confrontation mode for a while so let’s skip that for two days…

So the like/dislike will not solve the issues the merge caused and may be harmful - it may end up in dislikes to certain maps even in the case when the map was perfect just the match was bad/painful. (Instead of a singular dislike if I could tell whether it was a problem with the map, the game mode, the game engine e.g. network disconnections or the team/certain players why I disliked the match or perhaps because of RNG repetition, it would be actually useful for you at least.)

It may help to bring back e.g. Kamenka River which is not part of the map cycle any more (at least I did not see it recently) - but even that will work only if I can vote on all maps, not just the current. And if all maps are listed with modes intermixed and without text/region filters, it will be a bad experience to find the maps to vote. (Can you perhaps improve the custom match map selection so it becomes easy to set up an Avantgarde - Kamenka - etc map cycle easily without a huge amount of scrolling?)

For me a preferred maps system would be on the main screen, listing

  • War theaters: Moscow - Stalingrad - Tunisia - Japan - Normandy - Berlin
  • Game modes: invasion, conquest, confrontation …

And preference tick box next to each: preferred - neutral - not preferred
This way I could change my mind simply.

Plus a “detailed map selection” button to open a new screen where I can set my likes/bans per map+game mode, which could override the front page “global” settings.

(If this like/dislike will be a per-map thing after the matches, please don’t force us to vote - let us leave them unvoted as well as this is really not what I wish for map voting/vetoing, because I fear it will mix up the match and the mode.)

For the rest: thank you for putting this together. I like these reports about plans much more than reading about banning modders (can you perhaps ask to reduce Bazsi’s penalty by 50% to 500 years?) My only concern is that it is only planned features…

2 Likes
340

Stalingrad should be removed from high BR and be given subterranean passages or pipe passages like those in COD2

1 Like
341

We should get Leningrad and new rural maps based around Soviet counter attack on Axis captured soil around 1944-45

image

6 Likes
342

@MajorMcDonalds

If you say

Then can you please comment clearly in this context:

That despite any “likes/dislikes” or “bans”,

T-28 will not be storming Berlin and King Tiger will not magically appear in Tunisia?

6 Likes
343

Yes bigger maps whould be cool i suggest to have with “no” greyzone because the map it self is huge. Just playing on the whole map with more objective and there more missions. I hope the “new frontline” is this :pray::heart_eyes:

1 Like
344

Eh fighting didn’t commence in Leningrad itself, so no urban combat there, plus Veekay45 have better map proposals that can fit better

345

Man, I really can’t wait for STAR WARS weapons to appear in the hands of the Japanese.
hahaha
because I know they have little original WW2 content, but there was no need to create things just to balance it, because in the end it ended up unbalancing the game, and I know I’m not the only one who thinks Japan is the nation that benefits most from the game haha

346

same berling who should have a fkacktower defense area and flooded subway battles

1 Like
347

image
image1920×1080 457 KB

Why has it taken nearly six months to complete the investigation, collect suggestions and make a decision?
①As shown in the only valuable content, There are numerous serious issues in one picture!
The soldier’s voice is ‘British’, but the soldier’s default outfit and face are American. Are you forcing players to modify the soldier’s voice and then purchase the default British outfit and face with additional costume cards (or gold coins)? Even worse, are you forcing players to buy three sets of British outfits, three sets of British pants, three sets of British helmets, three sets of British faces, and three sets of British voices for this American soldier in the Pacific Campaign, Normandy Campaign, and Tunisian Campaign?" ？
Have you calculated how much cost a player needs to pay to change an American soldier to a British soldier in this way?
And changing a German soldier to an Italian soldier will cost even more!!!

Also, I would like to add some more questions:
② Where are the Japanese and American assault engineers?
③ Why are you still ignoring and refusing to add valuable player personal data statistics items?
④ How will you allocate your working time between Enlisted and AM, as well as your personal streaming time?
⑤ In Friday’s live stream, was there a developer who could take responsibility for answering players’ questions? After all, you have repeatedly claimed that you only forward players’ suggestions to the developers and cannot make decisions on their behalf.
⑥ So, were your answers to players’ questions in Friday’s live stream considered commitments? ！ So, how can we ensure the authenticity, effectiveness and timeliness of your and the developers’ responses when addressing players’ questions? ！ Honesty and trust between each other need to be built. So how will you build trust among you, the developers and the players? Why not invite the developers responsible for the issues that players care about during the live stream on Friday and ask them to explain these issues during the stream? For example, which developer was responsible for the “multiple changes to the US Army emblem’s Statue of Liberty and stars (switching back and forth between A and B more than five times) and updating it to the player’s client each time, which wasted team resources”?
⑦Which development team is currently in charge of Enlisted?
I noticed that C.R.S.E.D has left Epic and Linux. Does this indicate that the AM team is pulling back and focusing on AM? Please be honest and take responsibility and tell the players whether this strategy will affect the annual update schedule and quality of Enlisted (players don’t want to see a repeat of the nightmare in March 2025: “multiple delays and low-quality update content”!). 。

ps：
①These aren’t my only seven questions. Yesterday, I also raised a large number of doubts in this post as well.
②I think in the current situation, players prefer to talk to Gaijin/Enlisted Dev manager/Legal person/boss/chef/head chef. For a lot of players who care about Enlisted, problems have occurred after the “merge”, and the waiter/cashier/cleaner/salesperson/suggestion mailbox/customer message notebook can no longer provide sufficient service and assistance to players.

14 Likes
348

The Churchill is only driven by brits in normandy. They need to fix this

2 Likes
349

We gonna get GTA 6 before we get a new Enlisted Campaign/frontline

12 Likes
350

THEY should use rename order and customization

1 Like
351

@MajorMcDonalds Please start clearing up things like this, after all it is “operation transparency”. if you are unable to answer, please get people that can.

Thank you

4 Likes
352

dont think even Normandy gets a brit crew tbh.

1 Like
353

I have premium Churchill, just went in practice mode as you made me worry, it has Brit crew and Brit voices thankfully.

1 Like
354

I wish they could do that but it’s unlikely because if they were truly transparent you would see a lot of problems so unless we are looking for an entire shift of the order I would not get your hopes up.

355

But no matter what I say keep doing what you’re doing don’t let them get away just like how they also screwed us over on the silver exchange.

:brown_heart: :black_heart: :white_heart: :yellow_heart: :green_heart: :orange_heart: :blue_heart: :purple_heart: :hearts: :camel: :parrot:

356

It does, I have the squad, they have british voices (at least for me they do) but they only have british uniforms in normandy

357

At the end of the day, we all want this game to develop in a positive direction. Opinions may of course differ on the direction and contents of future changes. But these kind of questions are beyond what is reasonable, and simply makes one come off as entitled.

It is non of your business how MajorMcDonald allocates his own (professional) time. You do not speak for all players. Also, you can’t just summon the ‘head’. That person is not at your beck and call.

Take a step back and realize we are all just one forumite, that is it. At the end of the day, it does not matter what anyone has ‘invested in the game’.

This step was a step in the right direction. Let’s see how this pans out.

2 Likes
358

this has a passion project of @MajorMcDonalds the thread is literally about being transparency.

yet any sort of accountability/replies is like new stuff for the game - non existent

2 Likes