So far from all my experience in the Battle of Berlin Campaign with both the Jagdpanther and the SU-100 left alot to be desired. The Jadgpanther perform its job admirably and is quite a robust tank destroyer. But… The SU-100? Extremely underwhelming compared to the Jagdpanther and a pain to handle in Urban Warfare (Wich is mostly what Berlin is) the gun position is way too low to be of any use in Urban Warfare. So my suggestion is to replace it by the ISU-122 since the ISU-122 gun is more elevated and give it a fighting chance.
6 Likes
Please.
Think bigger.
ISU152. Accept no substitute.
8 Likes
Too long to reload. 
But…
But booooom… 
3 Likes
Have mercy on the poor germans trying to capture a point without fearing the big fek off shot of an HE 152mm XD
1 Like
I’m sure they could manage with the big cats.
I also dream of KV2 
4 Likes
I fear to see the KV-2 in the Stalingrad Campaign. At leas it would give a reason to give the Germans their Brummbar.
Sturmpanzer2 !
It was in Tunisia I know, but…
Campaigns will combine… probably would be at similar BR 
1 Like
Its a nice tiny derp tank. :o
1 Like
su100
su122
yep higher gun position checks out to me
i am sure you would equally love the su122 if they downgraded the gun from a 122 mm to the 100 of the su100 se the naming convention
This is the tank OP mentioned, an IS chassis SPG with a 122mm A-19 or D-25S cannon.
It would be very bad in game, its basically an IS-2 with no turret and only 90mm of front armor.
People bought the premium squad of SU-100 so they should keep their SU-100…
If you start changing what is inside premium squad you open a whole can of worms.
Even if you think the ISU-122 might be better some people might see its reload time, engine performance or armor layout and see it as worse.
And it would be precident for the devs to change premium squads they dont like into something THEY like but not YOU like.
5 Likes
I maintain my stance:
Equals:
Bonus. ISU152 came with HEAT able to ignore 250mm of armour…
I want it. My ultimate glass canon.
3 Likes
There is always room for more, don’t ask replacements, ask for more
There are people that did purchase or enjoy Su100. One day we might see even more powerfull or unique tanks (I can only hope we do get the chance to play with more options 
As for myself, I don’t own Su100, but I did enjoy Su85, untill i need a MG to defend myself
They cool tanks, imo Su100 is way inferior to jagdpanther on a 1 to 1 comparison, mainly because of lack of a machine-gun on the hull. But if when playing with friends Su85 works wonders as a tank hunter , I guess Su100 can only be better.
2 Likes
Amen
4 Likes
the su he wants to replace is the su - 100
he wants the su - 122
the 100 has you guessed a 100mm gun
the su 122 has a 122mm gun
what i am saying is the real reason for the change is a bigger gun
so lets replace the m4 Sherman with the Pershing for better gun position of course
Here:
I want the ISU152. I want the Pershing as well.
But I like good ol m4 Sherman. And even thought I don’t have it, ppl who do, might love their Su100.
We need more!
Every vehicle has its pros, cons, and roles to play. Even then the SU-100 isn’t completely useless. Just because it’s not the SuperN00bDestroyer420xD you want doesn’t mean you’re not able to support the team. That’s like saying I shouldn’t play as the M5 Stuart because the enemy has a Panzer.
I would never have anything outright replaced. Merely we all know one day the ISU will be added to the game
1 Like
When I played hng Pershing was one of my fav vehicles to play with.
Its surprising the lack of Pershings on ww2 games.
A tank that rarely shines on games, I can only hope for the day we see it in enlisted.
Alot of games share the usual faces, I like strange ones.
I do joke Alot about panzer iv armored, but, one of the reasons I use it, it’s because it’s super rare to spot in battle. Countless times I rather go with a pz4 armored than a tiger 2.
Alot of times unique shines more than a better one.
1 Like
SU-100 was the strongest anti tank vehicle in the soviet arsenal and should outperform both ISU 152 and IS 2 tanks.
The vehicle is not to blame, though the implementation of it is the problem.