Then replace the hellcat spot with the M26 Pershing. The M10 is virtually unusable, being an Open Top with its terrible turret rotation speed, Not sure why you all gave allied 3 open top tanks for the allied side, but its really unfair.
What’s the point? They’ll surely not add any new levels until merge/tech tree update, lol.
I do want the Pershing. But I don’t want to lose m10.
Pershing will probably be added sometime after the conversion.
not talking about adding levels, talking about replacing vehicles
Doesn’t make sense even more with upcoming techtree lol.
But okay
No it should not be removed and the Pershing and Hellcat will be added eventually
?
We already have the Hellpuss…
I guess I misunderstood OP and forgot it was in game
All they could do is release Pershing with winter themed map call it Battle of Bulge update lol. Stonks
They hate western allies anyway.
It might even be added with the conversion, US will get uptiered into KTs and Jagdpanthers without much to answer it.
in that case SUPER PERSHING.
Instead of getting the Pershing we could get the M4A3E8.
Why don’t you just say easy eight?
In my opinion it’s very bizarre this tank isn’t in game yet.
I could use the nickname, but I prefer to call (most) vehicles by their official designations.
The M10 should be the first vehicle in the tech tree line for tank destroyers, giving new players better anti tank capabilities at the expense of mobility and anti infantry.
The Pershing is a heavy tank, not a tank destroyer. The M18 should be next, followed by the M36. All three vehicles have a place in the game, just not in the format we have currently.
I want both honestly. I love me some Shermans.
Especially ones that are actual useful and don’t get blown up nonstop by hill-camping Tigers.
This thing could give a tiger some more runs for the money.
Yeah doesn’t it have Jumbo armor? If not it’s more like a Firefly, but still I’ll take it.
It has jumbo armor and a 76mm gun
You had me at Jumbo armor