Realism and historicall accuracy - where are they?

Suggestions
1
  • Realism
    The game was meant to be mix of sim and arcade game. So in my understanding it was meant to be a sim but with arcady things that make it faster (so no walking simulator) and easier to learn (so no 7 separate buttons to use a radio).
    So far the only major realistic thing is vehicles’ damage model and vehicle gameplay. And they are really nice mix of sim and arcade. For example planes: they have limited vision (sim) but they spawn midair (arcade). They are really well done (need balancing but core is there and it’s nice).
    But what about infantry? My main concern is movement that is pure arcade, only thing it “lacks” now is sliding. We have: bunnyhoping, dropshooting, shooting mid air, shooting while hiting the ground after jumping out of the window on the 2nd floor, etc.
    Also some infantry weapons have very arcady, unrealistic mechanics. For example MGs that are almost like assault rifles or shotguns that loose most of their damage after 5m
  • History
    So as we all know (I hope) ballance is more important than history. But if we get unhistorical things that make game unbalanced then something is not right. Or things that apparently are supposed to bring ballance but are so unhistorical that it’s just stupid.
    So far only historical things are uniforms, weapons’s and vehicles’ names and some maps. It’s ok, but this level of historicall accuracy is achived even by H&G. And as far as I know historical accuracy was one of the selling points of Enlisted.
Personal note

So 2 major reasons that got me interested in this game turned out to be empty promices.
In CBT I decided to not spend any monney untill OBT to see the direction this game will take. And tbh I’m really happy I did that, I would feel scamed now.

And finaly my sugestions:

  • Make this game more realistic in terms of infantry combat. It’s almost like CoD now. You did good job with vehicles so I hope you will manage.
  • What can I suggest for history… I guess not much.
    I would suggest to fix everything but apparently you don’t care anymore. That’s sad. I guess that bad PR it caused was mitigated by influx of new people that don’t care.
21 Likes
3

I mean, it’s hard to watch the game you dreamed about die a bit with every update.

9 Likes
4

I do not have the powers of developers but I can ensure you the game wont die less even if you
( and few others ) didnt create the same topic daily, with slightly different spelling.

1 Like
5

No man sky

Yep no man sky

8 Likes
6

this made me sad

11 Likes
7

i waited 5 years to play this not what we have now i’m sadder than you :sob:

3 Likes
8

I mean the second video is just Enlisted with the HUD turned off and some filters put on… while the player farms bots. I don’t see the big deal

3 Likes
9

The wapons are different have more “weigth” the actual wapons are ligth they dont give me the feeling of shoot and graphically I must say that it is more clean the alpha than the beta

4 Likes
10

Some of the weapons like the PPSh and MG42 have pretty low recoil which I’m sure people these days wouldn’t be happy about! That being said, the recoil does seem a bit more ‘dynamic’ but I can see why they simplified it.

It is, but that’s typical for video games. The pre-release footage of a game almost always uses a top-spec PC running graphics that are toned down for official release to ensure the consumer can run it.

3 Likes
11

I know im used to it
image

1 Like
12

the initial trailer just seemed slower paced, PPSH had more recoil.

2 Likes
13

I mean besides the fact that it shows like 10 seconds of gameplay all together, that was the theme they were going for in introducing the game. Sticking to the theme of a teaser.

14

Those videos themselfs aren’t great I admitt.
But tbh I’m willing to sacryfice all my in game progress to get back to CBT.

1 Like
15

In my defence cbt(alpha) have only gameplay trailer of 1-5 minutes the only real gameplay video are made when the game enter in the open beta

1 Like
16

So i think tester like you know better how the game is before and how many things are changed in 4-3 years (in good or bad)

17

TBH with all the game’s issues right now it is 10x better than what it was in CAT or CBT. Most things have been improved with a few key ones still needing fixing

3 Likes
18

As I have said, in my opinion CBT was way more enjoyable. With exception of premium squads.

4 Likes
19

I don’t know. But maybe I’m in the boomer mode now. I have to take a rest.

20

Nostalgia be like that. I have some real good memories of CAT but then I remember all the shitty things. The Assault maps being ass, the Bots not being able to do anything, Broken guns, and many other things

3 Likes
21

Ist not more different now assault maps are an hell bots dont know how exit a door and the guns well we know thath in this game exist the “Soviet guns” and the other guns and many other things