Well hes not wrong in that sense that there really is ton of more equipment on GE tree.
I guess, someone likes to grind them just for the looks but if I started the game now as new player and grinded MP40 just to get 0.2 more dmg and not much else, id just quit.
Considering the fact that iam even forced to grind Mp40, cant just skip the duplicates.
Well I prefer more options Iâm RPG player grind is normal for me now I will tell you something shocking but I prefer the old system with the campaigns âŚ
Thatâs not very soviet of you jokes a side I like to have options for Japan LMGs at BR II are good they give you different gameplay. To be honest Japan at BR II just need more vehicles and will be amazing faction. Ohh yeah and Type 1 smg to be moved to BR II cuz at BR III is not worth it .
Eeeeeexactly.
And for that exact reason I actually did enjoy grinding the Japan tree.
Not much BS filler guns in between stages just to make grind worse.
Should have been foldered from start.
Even from balance pov, its much harder to get BR5 equipment for GE, due to grind of duplicate weapons & vehicles
Lewis should be BRIII.
if you want a BR IV Vickers K might do but whatever.
what about the BAR1918; if youâre saying the BAR M1918 or hell the BAR M1918A1 are both âgoodâ as the BAR 1918A2 youâre delusional.
regardless both the BAR 1918A2 and the Johnson have the same shortcomings IE: small magazines.
personally Iâve always found the colt monitor to be extremely mediocre outside of like â5 maybe 10 meters rangeâ always have to remember to set it on semi-auto or it just wastes most of the shots; like the MG13, and M1918 it would benefit from a lower rof.
As long as there is BAR or some US LMG at BR II I donât really care how they gonna balance the BAR there is difference between concepts and balance I havenât tried the cold monitor the best bar I have used is the FN 1930 and in my opinion is really the best BAR but its a bar nothing special about it. With Germany i have paratroopers with FG 42 and grenade launcher so I donât see the bar as some magical weapon. I donât even know why they praise it so much for me all the BARS I have used where mediocre at best only the FN was feeling a bit better then the rest of the BARâs
Why? USSR already got SMGs (PPS-42 and 43) with higher rof and identical handling compared to MP38/40. âTheyâ dont need to have the best of the best stuff of every category in every BRâŚ
USSR already dominates BRIII and specially BRV btw.
The only semi they meet at BRII is the Armaguerra from the axis TT and this gun is far from great.
So they can roflstomp even faster?
Serious question: What has the axis team in their TT to justify this idea?
I have some âgreatâ ideas too:
MKb42H on BRIV, same to MKb42W (premium).
Kiraly 43M on BRIII â this gun came actually to counter the soviet PPSH-41 (box mag) way back when the campaigns existed and is placed on BRV, while the PPSH-41 box still enjoys BRIII with better handling and higher rof but less dmg!
Mkb42(W) is a gold order weapon, STG45(M) is a premium and itâs worse than both of them since it has pitiful 450rof and soldiers canât even buy vitality perk = pay to lose premium.
Good idea since itâs just sitting there not used in my BR5 stash, there is also Kiraly premium squad so better bring it down too. G41 should also get a buff to reload it takes too long.
As long it is historical, it is fine for me. The G41 was not the greatest semi, the G43 finaly got it done.
Also I think the G41 is fine at BRIII, but again far inferior to the US and USSR semis. It would be too powerfull for BRII tho.
I spend gold orders for the MKb42W when it first appeard in the Moscow campain. There it performed good and was a great counter for the PPSH spam. Even when the MKb42H came the gun still was one of my favorites. Now its totally useless and wasted gold orders.
Equip the expensive weapons which handle like BRIII weapons and get launched to BRV? Get roflstomped by AS-44 spam and go to gulag! #thereisnobias
The 1945 one uses the Intermediate cartilage not the same ammo as SKS-31/
The one in game is SKS-31 uses different ammo than SKS-45 / 31 uses
7.62x54mmR while 45 uses 7.62x39mm M43 ammo same as AK
So technically adding it would not be problem and no they are not the same gun so everything is OK
itâs just called sks, i call it sks-45 because itâs different from sk-31, apparently it saw field testing in the war likely against the japanese in august of 1945