PZ3N armor was never a problem



Two of them destroyed in a single shot each by 76mm of BT-7A how is it too much for BR2? You just want to take all Germany useful tools and make them even weaker than they already are (worst nation at BR2).

7 Likes

KV1 armor has never been a problem.

7 Likes

If Pz III N was never good to begin with, how is this a problem to replace it with a Pz IV E/F1 ?

I mean, I don’t really see the issue. Imo the Pz III N had to go up because it was just too much all around. I had the best firepower at its BR, but did not had any drawbacks : it has a turret, decent armor (look at any other BR2 tanks…) and good mobility, it was just a too good in every aspect.

Although I agree that Germany was dond dirty this patch, I could not disagree with the Pz III N going up

7 Likes

BR1 and BR2 players are noobs and don’t know how to or why spot tanks which is why you can take 4-5 enemy tanks from the same spot before someone visits you with TNT charge.

1 Like

Perhaps, though his armor is really powerful. But the main problem with the PZ 3 N is its cannon with 3 second reloads, which allowed it to give hell to infantry on a point, especially if the point is in open terrain. So 3BR fine for him and also take into account the fact that he will be given more powerful cumulative shells

50mm… Only 37mm and bigger guns can pen that armour.
Its not the armour, its skill issue since your teammates don’t spot tanks so a Pz III N can just take out your tank before you notice him (unless you spot the III N first, you win in that case).

6 Likes

Well, first of all, PZ 3 N occasionally just eats shells from Bazooka without damage, at least I had it. And Secondary, even not the strongest armor does not cancel the reload in 3 seconds and hell for infantry. Then again he was promised to be given new cumulative shells with increased armor penetration

2 Likes

They are issue for the tankers and iq of average German main that is too lazy to take out his rocket launcher. And at BR2 you are screwed without anyone having BR3 gear.

Tiger II H armor has never been a problem.

12 Likes

aim higher you can destroy pz4 the same way as pz3n

1 Like

Its the armour skirt which is spaced armour while Bazooka is a HEAT shell which is countered by spaced armour. Its not rocket science.

4 Likes

All these so called “balance” is a joke tbh. weapons and vehicles shouldnt limited to certain levels, instead they should been able to use in their historical areas, if pz3n was in moscow and tunisia then go ahead make it br 2, if kv1 was in stalingrad then same style make it br 2 or br 3, ppl should learn to counter these things instead of acting “ayo that so OP” to every strong thing, even 100kg bombs obliterate every tank in this game, not the mention most OP thing Explosive Packs!!

1 Like

Not just BR1 and BR2 players, otherwise we wouldn’t be getting nonsense like the very unnecessary Ofenrohr for the Japanese.

Only pathetic minmaxers are upset about about Pz III N going up.

5 Likes

I’m glad that we will be removing Fedorov from the game, and Tiger 1 will be fighting at BR2-3 (Tunisia). :slightly_smiling_face:

2 Likes

We’ve been through this before in campaign times. As a result of such a system there was hell in Moscow for the Germans, T34 and KV1 did a lot of “interesting” and “historical” things with German tanks. And it was not only with the Germans and not only with the Battle of Moscow.

1 Like

ppsh41 vs meme beretta 20mag ?

2 Likes

PPSh-41 drum vs MP40 (BR2)
PPSh-41 box vs MP 3008 (BR5)
VG2 vs AVT-40 (BR5)
Ghost of Fedorov Avtomat vs Mkb42 (BR2)
T-34 vs Stug (BR3)
Chauchat vs BAR 1928 in hand of the Poles (BR0)
Semoverte vs Sherman - completely nerfed in Enlisted as Semoverte has no heat (BR2.5)

3 Likes

adding prototype for premium or events is okay. adding tiger h1 to br 3 is also okay, is tiger op? yes. is it too strong against shermans? ofc it is, but its not our fault that allies didnt have any jumbo in tunisia. let the germans enjoy Tigerh1in tunisia and let the allies enjoy with their 10000kg bomb spam air.making every strong thing br4-5 for the sake of “balance” is not a good thing, instead devs should stop being lazy and add more maps like kursk(village area or smt) rostov, cairo etc… and then ppl can play freely br 3 tiger, and soviets can use IS-1 in Br 3, no matter how op 1 tank or 1 plane is there will be always a counter engineer/vehicle/explosive pack enjoyer, real “unbalance” would be mkb vs mosin nagant and thats another thing to consider lol

I started the game shortly before the merge and had time to play every campaign little bit, and berlin mostly and I still remember how bad was the pz4j vs T34s, but it is what it is. if soviets spams kv1 and t34 then germans should spam stuka, if soviets spams IL or p40 then germans should spam bf109 or fw190, everyone deserves to have their best gear. Im not being crazy I know its bad to play mosin vs mkb, kar98 vs ppsh but this also can be fixed by adding some limits. in a game where each faction gets nerfed somehow every 6 month and devs just keep adding prototypes we shouldnt care about the kv1vs pz3j1

1 Like

it was not because complaints were made about its gun besides, in the footage, the shot was fired into the side also from BT-7A, whose vishka is a powerful front sight on a low br and on a mobile base without armor, unlike T28, which has no armor or mobility with the same gun