If the game was more historic, german player in normandy should get 0 plane only 50 cumulative tank and every time they die their soldier and equipment is losed
Besides if there was an Abrams vs a Tiger or Tiger 2 all the german mains would be crying
This is also a form of balance. Tank for tank is no art, but machine for machine would be interesting. And probably the German players would put more anti-aircraft weapons.
But wait for Wirbelwind.
More like jammed AKs, airsoft plate carriers, and vehicles that struggle to start.
I wouldnāt have minded to see weaponry jamming mechanics in Enlisted. When it wasnāt certain if the game would choose the path of arcade, or milsim.
Now that itās 100% arcade⦠meh idk.
BF5 was super arcadey and somehow added jamming and overheating.
Jamming in some guns like the M1919 under sustained firing or overheating would add some consistency in the MGs that the soldiers carry and the ones on tanks would be greatā¦
Those are anti skill feature for avoid a single player monopolize the match
Ok that makes sense.
Some consistency between the MGs on tanks and the ones on the ground would be greatly appreciated though.
True tank MG need more dispersion is unfair only soldier one have it
Iām sorry, I donāt understand. Can you elaborate?
Tank mg have less dispersion penality because the dispersion dont become bigger wen the tank move, instead soldier mg get more dispersion wen the soldier move
Ok that makes sense. Yeah the tank should get more dispersion when moving for more equity of MGs.
Actually overheating in bf series (for hand held weapons) was introduced together with āmore you fire, better accuracyā mechanic on lmgs.
It lost itās function in bfv but lmgs are very nerfed there.
Is amazing how this did a 180° and now is the opposite
why dont you include abrams in there also⦠we all know those tanks were in normandyā¦
Whereās the space tank?
This?
I wanna strip this baby down (in Tank Mechanic Simulator).
Only IRL