Here that option is present too, and it is also P2W. But that is not the topic here. Here we are comparing premium time only, neanderthal.
Many WT players buy the premium even at full price, which also costs 10$ a month, just like Enlisted. And presumably we will get the same discounts here as there later down the line.
Maybe yours, not mine really (And not like there is some statistics to talk about), as i can win even with those unupgraded squads. And even be in 1-3 in tab. You have flexibility, but without knowing how to use it, it is still useless.
But there will never be a balance in matches in regards with squads, its still up to players, and skill is what win games, doesnt matter if in WT or in Enlisted.
Perhaps, but spread over 1000 matches you will start noticing a difference.
I have like 400h on Enlisted, skill is what win games.
And in case of equal skill, equipment gives you an edge. Premium times gives you such an equipment advantage in battle.
I feel like I should clarify what I wanted with this suggestion.
I meant this as a compromise to make the game more enjoyable for f2p players, but still give paying players something to speed them up and to make the difference between prem and f2p players smaller.
This isn’t exactly what I truly want, personally I think something like this: Unlocking active squad slots through grind would be superior, but I also feel that the premium time needs to be nerfed a bit.
Where these ‘facts’ keep coming? it dosent matter how many squad i bring my 5 star PPK, Chauchat and fully upgraded PPD 40 squad will destroy anything. if i bring some low level troopper squad my performance just drops.
so how many squads i need bring to outperform those?
Unless there will be winrate based MM, that will almost never happen. And you can have better equipment even without premium, he will have more choices, but guns are equipment, and those are what matter, not if he has one squad more.
It won’t destroy any aircrafts, or tanks that stay at a far distance, or get you past a heavily fortified MG position. Having extra squads would.
If the guns are equal, the extra squads, once again, give an objective advantage.
I am not saying it is a big advantage, but it OBJECTIVELY is an advantage and nothing you say will change that.
How would extra squad could help, if you already have squads that can do that?
He said he brought premium SMG, free SMG, premium MG squads. None of those can build an anti-aircraft gun. None of those have the ability to take out a tank from a distance, either. They do have objectively the highest DPS among squads, and are the best point contesting squads as a result. If you choose not to bring one or more of those three, it would hurt your ability to capture points.
No it won’t, as there is no squad that couln’t be destroyed by another, you have one more squad, but that guy with just 3 can still kick your butt, imo none of squads are that OP that you cant kill it with another.
With Mg squad you can easily destroy planes, with SMG you can clear almost everything. And tanks can be always flanked unless camping on spawn.
Edit: If you can’t really improvise with every squad, one squad more won’t really help you.
The premium squads are not the best for that anymore. The free MG and Assaulter squads are. Due to the fact they have more men and versatility. The prem squads were gutted further than they needed to be.
›2 3
If you can’t take points with a shitty rifleman, then extra slots via premium isn’t going to change that, my friend.
Not nearly as effective as a fighter plane or actual anti-air gun.
Well there you go. You need a bomber now. Sure, you can bring one via the squad upgrade thing, but that is still nowhere near as effective as a dedicated bomber squad.
Perhaps, but then you would still not have the bomber or engineer squads.
Being able to pick A AND B is always objectively better than having to pick A OR B.
You can put a bomber in most of your fireteams along with an engineer. Bomber squad is completely unnecessary now that you can do that. Engineer squad isn’t needed for pushing a point since a flak, stationary MG, or AT gun isn’t helpful when you’re supposed to be moving.
I beg to differ, i have more kills of planes with MG than with an AA gun. Fighter is better, you can still bring it, and kill tanks with it when you have bombs.
Or you can spot him for player with tank or plane.
Flak helps with anti-air a lot, and the extra building capacity allows you to fortify a point more on defense.
At the cost of an attacker or tank.
Right. Because those are always going to be useful.
AA is not needed to win games and tanks that stay out of boundaries cant affect battles outcome too much. And even if aircraft or tank would bombard me to death someone must come to cap zone and then its brrrt time.
Open topped capture points can be cleared by a plane. Have fun capping the first point on the village invasion map in Moscow if a plane continuously bombs it.
Flak is fucking dogshit you’re better off using an MG, PPD, or MP to shoot planes.
I’ve never needed more than the one engi worth of bullshit to fully fortify a point even big ones liike the gate and breach in Monastery Invasion. The squad is extraneous unless you want to use something specific like the MG nest or AT gun.