It’s just been forwarded on the other major post (made by me), still waiting for a official response by the devs though…
I hope they decide to do the right thing and use the weapon for a event squad, as it always should have been.
1 Like
I didn’t realize that three posts represent the entire player base. I agree there should be more silenced weapons for the rest of the factions, but denying new content? After all, you’ll forget about the weapon within a week.
As always.
2 Likes
to be honest I dont really see a single topic about supporting it either.
Since the silenced weapons to this point has been premium / GO / Event weapons its bit lame that suddenly one faction receives them in TT.
If this sht is something that has to absolutely to be added then add it to everyone at same time.
I doubt
3 Likes
Yeah, pretty much this.
If needed, TT silenced weapons could get significantly reduced dmg as tradeoff.
For example 1-2 dmg difference, not 0.2 - 0.5 difference.
3 Likes
Why should they support it? In the end, no matter how many people complain, they’re going to introduce them anyway. Because, as I said, none of us are “ambassadors for the player base.”
FOMO fault, You will continue to play enlisted with or without faction-exclusive weapons.
Think about it, how many events/updates have there been with that “threatening” content? Don’t you think it’s time to give up and open up to an Enlisted focused on new players who don’t care which faction is better or what gear they should have and why?
Fun fact: Never in Enlisted’s history have they removed content from an update because of a forum post.
Well pz3N got moved after enough soviet tears.
Maybe ? Maybe not. Seems the people that wants to keep the last remnants of history are quite upset.
So id guess its fair to say this addition might make some people just quit for good.
But doubt that any new player would install this just to get meme ppsh.
Too many ?
I guess a 7yr old could not tell differency between ppsh stick & MP40, if thats the playerbase you are after then I guess sure.
2 Likes
They aren’t going to change it.
1 Like
A weapon that never existed is not “new content”.
PPSh 41 is completely fake until proven otherwise.
Change my mind.
3 Likes
Moved not removed.
Devs not, next question.
No one’s forcing you to stay; if you don’t like a game, you’re free to leave it. Enlisted isn’t a 100% accurate military simulator. By now, after four years, you should have realized that.
Maybe it’s because it doesn’t bother them? Or because they play with all the factions? Or maybe they simply know that each faction has its pros and cons and that, just like in reality, the war wasn’t fair. There you have a remnant of history that you so advocate for. 
Which is pretty much the other thing people is asking here to move it as event reward.
Doubt this game can afford to lose more people so, perhaps they should.
Oh I thought you were forcing me, thanks for headsup
No sht sherlock ?
Well yea, I doubt such things bothers average 7yr olds.
And outside of KT2 what exactly is the pro GE has over soviets ?
War aint fair “history muh muh” pls add stormtrooper masterblaster 9000
Bit controversial statement.
I have gone through the trouble of making my own mod… and the ppsh has my fav sounds. It sounds soo berfy and I dont want to stop hearing that…
2 Likes
well we cannot make it to be removed but we can actually make its introduction but with no silencer or have nerfed statdistic just like hino rifle which was supposed to be on br4 but it was moved to br 3 so yea we can change the fact it will be introduced but we can change how it will perform
They could’ve just added a Soviet Guerilla squad to go along with the British and German one and all this could’ve been avoided
3 Likes
SG……The discussion is about implementing it in the game, not adjusting it. Stick to the topic of the post. What happens after the weapon is added to the game is not relevant to me.
…… I don’t know whether to laugh or cry lmao
-Lol? That was just a ramdom/vague comment to beggin with
-Obviously Even before it’s introduction any change to this gun can be made
and when it comes to this sentence you are nothing but typing nonsense to beggin with I cleary said that changes can be made before its introduction just like what happened to BP Hino Rifle which was moved from its br BEFORE the release of the BP and you are saying that my argument focus after the introduction of this weapon
obviously we cannot change the fact it will be added or maybe yes? : P ( But i mostly think that it will be added with some kind of nerf at least)
What would a silenced PPSH-41 be without a silencer?
This entire post is about the “non-implementation of the weapon in the TT” And my comments are about why it should be implemented, no one is talking about what you say. → not about what changes could be made to it or what BR has or should have.
Get off your high horse and read what you write.
and since the beggining i was exposing my personal opinion that is what i mentioned above who da hell is gonna tell me what to think/opin? who says that my posts must be 100% always related to the topic nonsense to beggin with
if someone needs to get off its high horse is you and SEE that all this disscusion was spining around my personal view that PPSH (S) can be introduced but since is a free Silenced weapon it must have a certain disaventage like high recoil or dispersion
They also could have put the sawn off carbine in a Japanese partisan squad
1 Like
Topic is closed
1 Like