Please no new campaign the playerbase is already to small for 5 campaigns

Suggestions
21

fair but still what would matches dissolve to? the same as in Normandy, just defending? there will be no banzai charges or defending to the last man on iwo jima, your not gonna get it in this game

22

Axis attack in Normandy and Berlin, ot just means the devs have to make a map where they do attack. Pacific will be fine, it just may not be the gameplay you are looking for.

Besides, with the new gamemode, attacking will be a far more common occurence for the traditionally defending side.

23

its just a over represented theater quite a few people would rather a less represented theater

24

Then Burma or the Philippines. The devs have literally not touched the pacific whatsoever, so anything is open to them. Just don’t do Kalkhin Gol or Manchuria, because we don’t need a 4th Soviet Faction.

25

but so is any french front, they could also reuse alot of the map assets

26

That bring a German faction, and the German playerbase is already extremely spread out, hence this post. Adding a France campaign would just make that problem worse.

1 Like
27

but would adding any more split the player base anyway

28

Yes, but pacific would be the campaign that causes the least problems. There aren’t enough US or Commonwealth factions for it to be a noticable problem for those campaigns, and the Japanese would be entierly new, thus probably splitting the playerbase evenly between all sides and factions.

2 Likes
29

Given that Tunisia also contains a LOT of copy pasted US, it would be much better if they would be left out completely in Pacific campaign as it would be pretty much 3rd US campaign.
German playerbase is stretched thin, that is true. But doing literally the same thing to other factions too leads nowhere.

3 Likes
30

Well doing a pacific campaign without the US would be kind of difficult, and Okinawa would be an opportunity for some of the American Naval Aircraft. Besides, I think the American playerbase can take one more campaign, seeing as Tunisia is mostly British.

31

It would not be complete. Having the campaign system reworked into theatres would be better, but just simply adding maps does not account for the multiple other battles being disregarded.

2 Likes
32

i hope they deliver as much as they can possible can deliver/work on.

i dont give a shit about lack of “playerbase” many state coz most players are yet to do something valuable in the batlefield besides wasting tickets. atleast bots, play the objective.

3 Likes
33

" [Please no new campaign the playerbase is already to small for 5 campaigns] "

I have ZERO problems getting into matches.

And you can yell “Bots this and Bots that” but I get MANY kills and MANY wins.

Can’t be that bad huh?..

2 Likes
34

Hell no. Still splitting into historical and ‘ha ha Panther in Moscow’
Just ‘play any campaign, any faction’ would be enough.

35

I’m keen for Pacific with Australia as a faction, but happy to wait and let devs improve what we already have for the time being.

36

WWII would definitely not be complete.

37

i would like to see as many campaigns as they could make for ww2 and maybe even other wars, but for now they should keep the 5 we have, there aren’t enough players for a new campaign

2 Likes
38

They have added three campaigns so far, and each time people said the same thing. I haven’t seen any change in the speed of finding matches or the number of players in them. If anything I feel like there are more players now.

2 Likes
39

And still the devs ignore it and release crap copy paste campaigns…

40

That at maximum works with Stalingrad and Moscow… until I spawn my KV against Moscow only Germans.