Make this masterpiece into a post so they see it
She already did in the past, and had alot of support from the community.
you can check it here/give your support there if she still considers that topic relevant to todays game:
the fight for better premium squads its as old as CBT start. (1 year of asking)
I use them mainly to help me grind faster so personally they are ok for me. The PPD in Berlin and the 2 BAR squads in Normandy are still ok for me (finished those campaigns apart from allies Normandy). The M3 SMG one in Normandy is really bad imo. No reason to have in comparison to techtree squads.
I have the 2 BAR and the m3 SMG squads in Normandy and the PPD one in Berlin
Not 100% but at least they should have 1 engineer with normal engineer gun
Various premium tanks are borderline OP since they are either slightly or a lot better than the techtree ones. Same goes for the new LMG squads in Moscow. For the rest in depends. For example as i said above, the M3 SMG in Normandy is crap. The 2 BAR squads or ok. The PPD in Berlin is fine and very good until you get the Ppsh-41 in the techtree. Then it becomes obsolete.
Yes, only when i want to grind a new level in the techtree fast
Some tanks and the new LMGs in Moscow are P2W. Others like the M3 SMG in Normandy are underpowered.
Even if i have a few i think in general they are way too expansive. With 50% off on sales their price is ok, but full price no.
I think this would make buying them more popular since they could be as good as normal squads but with a nice XP bonus. Personally i may buy a few of them in this case, not sure
1 Like
No, it is 490… which means you are going to pay 600 gold for one slot at minimum.
Good deals huh. Double paywalls are scummy no matter how you put it.
2 Likes
still a good deal nontheless imo (regarding the outcome - extra slot)
i m not defending them . ofc i would like to have what i own for half, 1/3d of the price… thats more than understandable. isnt a nice way to sell a product…
It might be, however, as I have already said above… you can hardly name a thing you can´t buy in Enlisted.
Trying to force people to buy MORE in order to be able to BUY MORE is just an unnecessary bullying at that point.
My point is not that I would love to have stuff at low price or free even… my point is, that there is a line drawn between bussiness and daylight robbery… which is pretty much double paywalling.
1 Like
I’m happy to help, I’m just choosy about when and where. A lot of you are trying your hardest to sincerely help carry this thing to the finish line, and as an American I’m culturally wired to support the underdog. 
I have not (yet) bought extra slots on any of my campaigns.
I haven’t bought extra squad slots because I just finished both the Moscow and Berlin campaigns (I do side-by-side progression…I never let Axis or Allies get more than half a level ahead of the other). I’m currently level 20 on Normandy and 23 on Tunisia…so the end of the road is in sight on both those campaigns (I may leave Normandy for last, I was burnt out on that theater before I even heard of Enlisted).
But a NEW campaign might be worth extra squad slots…so right now I’m still of a wait-and-see approach. I’ve also worked out that after about 4 battle passes, I have enough EXTRA gold where it makes sense to purchase an extra squad slot (and that’s a beautiful thing!).
I think free to play (F2P) needs a lot more love than they currently get. So yes, I absolutely would support giving them an extra squad slot.
I was saving this for suggestions, but I’ll pop it here. I would add a Coupon or a Token or something in the Battle Pass, available for F2P players, and put it around level 40 or 45…wherever a F2P player might reasonably progress to. This Coupon/Token, once you acquired it, could be redeemed for something substantial, like an extra squad slot, but only during the subsequent/following Battle Pass.
It’s a crude idea, but I think it’s something that needs to be in there to reward people for grinding through. Other ideas for the Coupon/Token might be: skins on weapons, customized or plated weapons (like the twitch pistol drops), maybe interesting melee weapons (like the sabers) and so forth.
I think more things need to start showing up to support repeat players, free or otherwise. Good on you for keeping the torch lit in that regard.
take the following not as “greed” but as actuall fact over the issue.
please dont forget pay users as myself that own the max slots ingame already on that suggestion.
either make it as only f2p players get them, or pay users too but will get a extra slot over the maximal 10?
the “more slots for free users” was suggested countless times and i support it, fully, but what a pay user that already have 10 slots will get?
examples of my campaigns:
what a user like me (that already have the maximal slots bought) would get? if you gonna suggest that, and i support you do so , please consider this on the equation. isnt greed, i would understand it perfecly, but, others may disagree why X can get somethign i had to pay yesterday for free.
this is for the longterm of the game. there is a group of players mainly from alpha like me or Closed beta players that played this daily or almost daily that support the game and are active enough on the community and see the game grow/change and still come for more, and yet, we “all” share the same concern regarding premium squads.
we do all (at certain degree) own them, and keep supporting the game for a fella that cant or choose not to , to be able to play it for free. we just want our toys to be more inline with what the game can offer for free.
i did tho, enjoyed your answers, both of them. i hope i read more of you in the community.
and please, if you find the time and you are willing to put effort into it, suggest a way for f2p players to have more. hopefully will be well writen that devs may give it a shot into consideration,
1 Like
theres a need for a suggestion regarding that ,with the community support , for them to let players buy one, without the need of the other.
feel free to suggest that. i belive you will have full atention of the community over that issue.
sadly i cant, since i have hundreds of days of premium ticking and 10slots on all campaigns, cant do prints to structure a topic around it.
Not even first time.
This is as pointless as suggesting the option to grind some slots out or stop releasing distorted and more P2W version of desired premium squad composition.
I honestly feel a bit tired about it at this point
However, best that can be done is to keep talking about it, and people stop relativizing it.
2 Likes
nothing is pointless.
the only pointless thing here is the lack of a response from CM’s or Devs or who ever read the topics.
but that is also understandable. at some degree…
i would still suggest , to keep pushing the issue to be resolved.
i m doing a monthly premium thread/state it everywhere i can, and i will only stop when i find them balanced comparing to normal squads.
2 Likes
Well, I´m not going to try to discourage you, but don´t expect much attention. Also next time you make such a suggestion and achieve some sort of big discussion without trollfishes etc. derailing it, it might be worth tagging Grosse Kaiser to it, because there is higher chance for any response after a while.
1 Like
That’s a fair point. Again, it’s an idea that I’m still working through and that’s why I haven’t yet posted it in suggestions.
I think I understand what you’re saying here. You said the “longterm of the game,” and that is the VERY question that needs to be considered. What does the longterm look like? What is the expected rate of new campaigns per year? What is the IDEAL campaign that development could hold up and say “This. This is our (Darkflow’s) vision of what a campaign in Enlisted should be.”
There are 4 distinct campaigns available now with a good representation of weapons, units and map designs, but they each seem to suffer from their own balance/design issues. Looking at it from the outside that seems like a problem to me. Is there a roadmap for this game? Is there a “release” schedule for features or even a list of features to look forward to as it develops?
These aren’t issues that you are responsible for solving (I mean, unless you work for Darkflow), so please don’t take it that way!
I don’t benefit directly from you supporting Enlisted, but it’s to your (and others) credit that you do support them. You’ve (the alpha and beta testers) helped keep their business model intact beyond what many (including myself) have contributed. Speaking personally, I think we (and especially those like yourself) deserve to at least see something indicating what’s planned over the next year or two.
I’ve avoided MMOs for the most part because the model has resembled more and more that of a gambling nature to me. My game of choice, and this was true before the insane amount of math I needed to get my engineering degree, is Blackjack. Blackjack has the most even numerical odds for winning (about 49.6% to the player, 50.4% to the house). MMOs are not really set up to win, but much like gambling, you should enjoy spending your money (value for time).
Enlisted checks those boxes, for now. The money for premium and my initial investment for the battle pass I do not regret. (The money I spent on War Thunder, by contrast, was not a good investment).
If it continues the way it is now, with minimal communication about the future of the game and no roadmap for content, I’ll probably continue to trickle a minimum of money into it.
I’ve already been bitten by previous games and right now I’m in the twice shy phase about where my money goes. It’s not personal, it’s not that I don’t believe in the game, it’s nothing other than my personality (engineer) and my experience with other games. I’m too old to be an idealist, but still young enough to enjoy good games.
1 Like
Everything is pointless till we actually create a shitstorm for something and are forced to address it and respond, Do you know how many shotgun threads i alone made? Let alone the rest of the forum and that was for such a small thing, which never the less was important since they made an entire class of weapons unusable and forgot about it cause they really didn’t care.
- Not happy, except recent LMG and 9 man riflemen. Nerf of CBT squads was quite close to deception. Other 4 men squads are not worth buying except for early access.
- All early access, 9 men Berlin and Tunisia, LMG in Moscow, some discounted vehicles.
- Allow addition of some F2P specialists. An engineer at very least.
- They are useful until level 10 more or less. After that their usage is bad for victory comparing to f2p. 9 men rifles are useful even in late campaign but overall are worse than maxed out F2P. 5 LMG squads are as good as F2P, better if upgraded.
- No, except LMG and depending on BP missions 9 rifles.
- The only squad not clearly inferior to maxed out F2P is new LMG squad.
1 question thou what do you do with all the people who bought the mg13/Lewis premium squads do we get to keep them as they are now. if you do decide to remove them or change them. the extra engineer and 2 extra mgs are what i paid for removing/changing them would be like bait and switch
1 Like
Exacly what happen on cbt squads.
nice profile picture king.
1 Like
dont know, I personally believe that the devs are very active at following our feedback, its just that they take some time to consider it instead of nerfing this and buffing this just to “please” the crowd.
-Which I think is a good thing, not every shitstorm is based on good ideas.
1 Like
Thats confirmed to be a lie looking at the FW cannon bug. Reported for months by many people and they found that out after people started to spam post in the news comment section. Before that, they didnt know that the FW was bugged.
They only listen to certain comments posted on staff-made threads.
Or the SA rifle NOBODY wanted. Or the economy rework or my second fav:
Tunisia CBT/ OBT feedback.
1 Like