I’ll recheck my books tonight, but IIRC the Glacis and Turret were protected to 90mm. (in checking with Tank Encyclopedia and Wiki, they both show Frontal @ 90mm, Sides @ 75mm). But I have some books that at times are more accurate than online stuff so we’ll see what they say when I get home tonight.
That’s a tall ask for anything equivalent on the German side of things.
Not saying that the books can’t be wrong, or the internet for that matter. But they are both saying the same thing to me.
I would exactly call it “too late”, seeing as they changed it before the update even came out.
Also I was referring to the sniper version when comparing it to the Mkb.
The regular avt could be restricted to radiomen and engineers if they want, I would be fine with it. Same with zh 29. I unlocked it but don’t even use it that much, I run it in my 3 man radio squad and that’s it. I have almost unlocked the Mkb and I want it removed.
Technicaly those few Sturmpanzers that were created served only in Africa. But that wouldn’t be a problem for devs… (looking at you M2)
the first 100 or so complaints were made when they changed the troop order economy, which was a really long time ago now
they are still 2 very different guns and i would in no way consider them symmetrical
i dont really care that much about the AVS, i like using it myself, i was mostly just saying that the standards you use to say the mkb should be removed (atleast in that post) could be applied to some soviet weapons
like this for example. late game berlin soviets and late game moscow soviets is almost identical, with both of them being AVS(/AVT) and ppsh spam. the only differance is vehicles and the AVT (if you look at the listed stats the AVT and AVS is almost the same aswell)
In the end…
Those that dislike the mkb42h simply have to not put it in their lineup 🤷
Kv… 
Yup.
They dont have the balls to replace levels, so once its in the campaign levels its there forever
So is that the modelling from WT? Is that what they will base it off of? Or the real thing.
Because I see this:
I don’t mind, though. I like the mkb42h, it’s fun to use and is a nice balance factor vs Russian ppsh and such.
I’m here for fun, if I want to stomp an inferior side, I go play allies in Tunisia with my BARs and tommy guns.
Moscow is FUN atm. But they just have to rename it “eastern front” and bam! Problem solved.
Honestly the most based opinion i have seen all year
No! No no no
Stop all this full-auto BS at this point. What happened to just picking up a BA and fighting in Brutal close quarters where things like rifle buts, knives and good aim mattered.
But nahhh PPSH, MKB, AVS go brrrrrrr
I was once like you back in CBT. Unfortunately this game will only increase the full auto. Its something we have to accept or leave the game I’m afraid. The end game looks like a CoD match than WW2
You are actually a buffoon if you use the AVS in full auto.
Rapid fire semi is the way to go. It makes the SVT38/40 pointless
I don’t think I’ve ever run my FG42’s in auto unless by mistake on toggling the fire mode.
Way more controllable that way. Not that I use many of them.
Now that I can max star my G43’s though, I’ve been going back to them with appropriate perks for my Troopers.
The FG42 II with recoil perk is insane on auto. It has less recoil that most SMGs, no lie. I put the FG42 in semi and FG42 II in auto
I think I have 2 or 3 of those (and I’ve been maxed for a while) equipped. Never really tried it with the perks but I’ll take your word on it. Maybe I’ll give it a go tonight.
Believe me I’d love nothing more… but to do so (removing mkb42h) we would also need to remove avs… and then limit ppsh because it would be a no contest op smg (already is) and then 3 lmg per squad? Make that 1…
And so on. People would complain even more. It’s “ok” to remove mkb42h, but gasp! Let’s not dare remove smgs or others…
Sadly the whole game is automatics oriented. Heck, they nerfed SEMIS and all it did as a result was to make more people use more assaulters squads and automatic rifles as a result…
