Flak 88 will do
Seriusly
German have a lot of good TD wo can do something aganaist kv and t34 so is possible make all more historical accurate
War thunder flack88 truck best tank
No armor is best armor as they say
this is really dumb because moscow is already asymmetrically balanced with the mkb against ppsh and avs. axis needs something else, could be something other than a SF rifle
no they donāt, they wear dark coats that blend in with trees, WDYM
It would. They just didnāt AT THAT TIME⦠like the mkb42h. Stug and company came a lil bit later.
So since we already talk of nerfing germs again by removing inaccurate historical stuff, letās push it further by adding t34 and kv.
For fun and history!
Actually light veichle in war thunder can be overpenetred so yes no armor best armor
Against the KV, given it has 90mm Frontal Armor, I donāt know about that particular one.
However if we give the PZ4 and add the StuG III , and they can use the GR38/A round, that would be a perfect counter to the T34.
Historical accuracy is more of a convenient argument, when the real reason is because it is a powerful gun.
Nobody complains about the fnab-43 being in Normandy or the armaguerra in Tunisia.
The number of times a person is killed by a weapon in this game is proportional to the number of complaints towards historical accuracy
I mostly agree with you. It is a good idea to replace the MKb 42(H) with something that fits in Moscow better. And sorry for destroying the topic, but I guess itās kinda a rule that when someone mentions the one that shall not be named, the topic is over:)
Wait German dint use stug in moscow?
Actually StuG would be historically accurate. They were in play since France.
And by the time they got them to Moscow region, they were already issued HEAT rounds (Improved).
I didnāt mean air operations. I meant having a paratrooper squad fighting on the ground - something to limit the FG 42 spam while being realistic, mainly without restricting it to gunners (which triggers me every time I see that proposition).
its a powerful gun yes, but its far from op/breaking the balance
AVS vs Mkb is not even close to symmetrical balance though. they are very different guns with different restrictions
quite a bit better than the zh
AVS is a full auto trooper weapon while the mkb is restricted to snipers (right now atleast). your standards are inconsistant
far too little, far too late
75mm. A PZIIIJ is barely sufficent to penetrate it.
If we take the PZIIIL its long 50 can kill KVs and T34s a lot more easily.
Iām only pumped halfway through both campaigns on Moscow and I havenāt even encountered it yet. Iām on console so thatās a factor, but like the dreaded 9 man fg42 squads of normandy it seems like mostly a non-issue to me.
Personally Iād prefer if they hewed closer to historical accuracy with the weapons, but really itās not all that bad. I see it more as historically probable
Mostly agree.
But must not forget that this doesnt ONLY apply to the MKB. The russian SF (AVS36) are just as bad.
My main problem with moscow RIGHT NOW and why i want to see the MKB removed and AVS restricted is:
A. To tone down the Full-auto meta of the game. Seriosly, you guys remember K98k and M91/30? How fun and immersive it was when everyone had only these guns?
B. To keep the game more historically accurate. STG , ZH in moscow and unlimited AVS is dumb. Lets return to regular BAs and semis.
Thats kind of my problem, im fine with normandy and berlin being more full auto focused, thats fine. But moscow just doesnt feel right
Swap the beretta with the Suomi, and Mkb with a g41.
Also you correct on the uniforms, I misposted. Whenever I see said uniform though, I realize that they probably have a smg, so I prioritize them at mid distances.
Also making a gun unlocked at level 30+ does not fix a āproblemā that starts at level 13ish (I forgot when you get the drum mag in Moscow).
By the time you unlocked the weapon you should know how to counter those guns (keep them at distance) most of the time I die, I would have died no matter the gun the guy was using.