Sooo, you think that it’s just a character, huh?
otherwise it would be a psychiatric case and I don’t want to think he’s so sick, I prefer to think that he plays a character
Oh, there he comes, brace yourself!!!
I use Kar98K’s and Label’s in Berlin, so I’m probably a bit from both columns.
I use the vg2 in berlin and is good
Dont forget about the 30 mm HE cannon. Its disgusting xD But to be fair the counterpart from the US isnt that shabby either being an better air fighter per say so its somewhat even but the German is better if i have to pick betweeen them both
belt fed Johnson riffle
Two further projects followed the T40 – the T48 and T53. Both were chambered for the new T65 cartridge (which would eventually become the 7.62x51mm NATO), and both were designed to have interchangeable feed systems, so they could use either 20-round box magazines or disintegrating belts
I’m a very, VERY bad pilot myself… so I wouldn’t know. I’m just annoyed whatever the side I play on when it rains bombs every 30 seconds…
Ladies and Gentlemen, We got him!
yeah they have destruction written all over. 500kg bombs raining like candy to
Aniway the topic has took the ship and say by
Same. I have a dozen fully upgraded on troopers with the ROF Perk.
I guess we’re just both crazy.
And that’s okay.
Right Soul?
Right Soul!
Hopefully final post on subject.
-
Symmetrical balance is overrated:
I do not want every gun to have an exact equal on the other side. I do not want the Mkb, even though it’s the “closest” to the Avs. The Russian smgs are not unstoppable. Most people carrying them are wearing brightly colored uniforms that stand out more than anything else in the game; pick them off from a distance. -
Avs isn’t that good:
The Avs isn’t that much better than the other Semi-auto rifles, especially if they need the fire rate when on semi. When talking about the sniper version, the Avs’s extra fire rate doesn’t help it. If you are shooting beyond 50m, 3 shots a second is hurting more than helping. If you are shooting under 50m, use the non-scoped version. So even if you wanted symmetry, the G41 would fit much better than an assault rifle that happens to have a scope on it. -
It doesn’t fit Moscow:
Each campaign has its own “feel”. Berlin and Normandy are late war campaigns with powerful weapons. Moscow and Tunisia are early war with bolt action rifles. I don’t mind stgs being in the former, but not the latter. Enlisted is fun because it is slower and everyone doesn’t have full auto weapons, go to cod if you want that, or go to Normandy and Berlin, but leave Moscow alone. -
The devs do listen:
After people complained about equipment for silver, they did listen, at least a little. I will make a suggestion post for the devs to see. -
Just because a ship is sinking:
It doesn’t mean we should poke holes in it. I really dislike the attitudes of “it’s already unrealistic”,” bolt actions are boring”, or “I don’t care anymore”; there is a reason why you are playing this game instead of CoD, don’t make this game identical to CoD.
If it is broken, fix it.
Wasn’t a good topic anyway. Nerfing a side who’s already struggling even more for the sake of historical accuracy is a bad idea gaming wise.
To be historically accurate there should be t34 and KV RIGHT NOW, so if we remove the mkb42h, we must add those vehicles for the same reason: historically accurate.
I mean, he wants BARs or Johnson LMGs for US infantry to counter FG 42s, and when I responded with a proposition to lock the FG 42 and Johnson to the hypothetical paratrooper squad, he said that he doesn’t want a bolt action simulator. So it kinda looks like a wrong game for him, idk.
And the german need a tiger
I would love the KV in Moscow so i can hunt it with the GRB Also because i love its design
Nah, “not historically accurate”. Pz3j is the best they had near Moscow.
I mean, game balance isn’t important so why not?
In future maybe wen we have paratroopers the dev do this for now we have only the weapon
he has cometh