Most Armored plane and still air keeps its up while using air break.
in general full auto snipers dont make sense to begin with, especially since they arenāt accurate enough, so you use them like regular ARs.
switch the Mkb42 would be nice, so both axis and soviets have a semi sniper rifle.
Hey, I have a suggestion!
How about instead of ruining a lot of peopleās reason to play this campaign and getting rid of a lot of fun and eventually players by taking your suggestion of removing full auto weapons, we take your idea of BAās only and turn it into a new gamemode. That way we donĀØt have to be annoyed our favourite toy/reason to grind got removed and you never have to touch anything fully automatic in your life again!
Itās useful close quarters at <5m.
lmao
Who said remove autos? Point the fucking finger. No one.
Limit them, buff BAs. If you want to spam full-auto weapons all day long, BF and COD may be best choices
1 Like
Except BF and COD suck. I like at least having guns that are feasible, and not facing a thompson without a barrel or stock.
Also, you kinda suggested it.
I donāt mind full autos in Normandy and Berlin. But the ba only mode is pretty much is Moscow. If you want aāfull auto Moscowā play Berlin , especially now with custom matches you can play Berlin with Moscow maps.
Maybe a few months back. The current meta are smgs for russians and lmgs for germans. BAs are only used by the lower level players at this point. The only exception being the winchester, cause thatās basically a semi.
Just play a match. Every 2nd russian has a PPD.
And, no i wonāt play Berlin. I think the maps are a lot worse.
Iād say, leave moscow be how it is and introduce a different, more realistic gamemode. That way both sides can be satisfied and it may even expand the playerbase, rather than decreasing it. Cause, letās be honest, if you really care about historical accuracy, thereās a lot of better games out there. Enlisted is kinda in the middle. So letās keep it that way.
Fun fact, the US gets the Springfield M1903A4 a bolt action and Germany Gewehr 43 sniper, and when they get the FG-42 II sniper the US gets an M1 garand sniperā¦ so even if they canāt remove the AVS would it be setting a bad precedent? Not really.
G43 is the same as the regular Garand equal as effective
G43 vs Springfield 1903A4 and FG-42 II vs Garand
Do Us get Garand that late ? Thought they got it when Germans got the G43
Sniper yes, simply pointing out it has already been done and if it was the reverse the forum would be burning with Germany suffers threads.
oh yeah you where talking about snipers i saw nowā¦mb. Havent gone to those yet. Tried the FG42 once though but i sucked at it xD
3 Likes
To be fair - Stujka is way ahead in the CAS stakes - but the Il-2 is equally far ahead in the Air-Air stakes - if only against people who canāt actually fly very wellā¦ but thereās a lot of those so itās mostly happy hunting! 
weak
Why the t60?
3 Likes
because people bitched about that being OP .-.
1 Like
Sorry, pal, but Iām on Steinerās side on this oneā¦ IL-2s are crazy versatileā¦ It behaves quite like a fighter (itās really very easy to turn and itās faster than Ju87), has the firepower of ground attack aircraft and when it comes to classic clash between those two, IL2 wins due to much thicker armor.
I understand that you probably donāt want the developers to nerf it, but they should really make it at least feel a bit heavier and slightly worse to turnā¦ and only keep the armor thoāā¦
Also, I donāt think the rockets suck,ā¦ I was able to do some serious mayhem on the ground with itā¦
1 Like