So anyways, an issue that was brought up in a post somewhere about the proposed 1-5 BR system was that people would have a lv 3 loadout and would leave matches early to try and get a down tier match.
It dawned on me that yes, this will be a very horrible thing to deal with, new player and old alike. The most simple solution I and others seem to have come up with, is just prematurely add more mm tiers so that level 3 loadouts see level 2 and 4 loadouts rather than 1&2 or 4&5.
I would also like to suggest a simple but reasonable preventative “feature” to disincentivize such awful behavior. If a player leaves a match early, restrict their mm to only up tiers until they complete a match !AFTER! they have left 2 games prematurely in a day. This measure will also prevent a lot of future headaches to.
As for why the game needs such a measures, allow me to highlight a few consequences that will arise without preventative measures:
Tier 3 will just be the new endgame.
New players will near constantly leave after getting nothing but unfair matches.
Tier 4 and 5 will likely be unplayable with the amount of people leaving early and the number of veteran players will be at its max.
If battle ratings = tiers in technology tree then… this new system will not change anything.
In fact - it might be even worse. Because a new player will not have the ability to play Normandy or Berlin (a campaigns without the bias), he will receive PzB 38/39 and with some luck - he will damage tracks of T-34.
I am just woundering why after you tracked the tank you didnt jump on the T34 and throw the explosives on the engine deck and cook it then throw it down? I do that the jumbos and Tigers and it always works for me