I am not joking, american teams suffers.
I tried to play with Axis for a couple of games (campaign level 7 with Germany and level 12 with America) and the difference between the two factions is absurd.
Germany got better weapons overall, better tanks and better maps like wtf, it’s so one sided, my winrate with american units it’s like 10-20% (1-2 win in 10 battles) instead with german units 60%-70%
It’s ridiculous.
Nerf the invulnerability given by the rally points too.
1 Like
Never had this problem, my win rate is the same for both nations. And I don’t think either one has objectively better weapons than the other
6 Likes
yeah, i can confirm with @21557209
i don’t deny that i didn’t played so much on the american side ( although i started from a bit, and i’m at level 4 )
but as far as i have seen, win rates are actually balanced.
you win as well as you loose. major factors are people that plays or not the objective.
the jumbo is way more better than the pz4, so okay americans suffer but its normal, its normandy ^^’
3 Likes
The German players are often just more skilled.
Normandy is the only place Americans can play their own nation and idk, they kinda struggle with just gitting gud?
1 Like
There is nothing wrong with Normandy in terms of balance. Teammates not using brains is not a game´s fault.
3 Likes
“German players are often just more skilled”. Yeah sure… sounds like bullshit.
2 Likes
No. With World War 2 games you just see German players having higher kill/death ratings. It’s an objective fact.
Last 5 times when I played normandy invasion as ge, I lost 4 times. So I guess it’s problem of hours you play, welcome in the club!
2 Likes
“my win rate is the same for both nations. And I don’t think either one has objectively better weapons than the other”
So what? lol… only because YOU don’t see this problem it doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.
Are you sure about that? Check some video on Youtube or just test it by yourself in the practice mode. I can assure you that the MP-34 deals more damage compared to the M3 grease gun. It’s just impossible that 8/10 times i play D-Day or Normandy campaign i struggle to get a win even if i make 100-130 kills and 200 assist, there is something wrong in the balancing.
“the jumbo is way more better than the pz4, so okay americans suffer but its normal, its normandy ^^’”
Ok, Jumbo is better than the PZ IV but that’s the only decent tank that americans have and they need LEVEL 20 of campaign to use it
Puma VS M5 Stuart = Puma is better because it have explosive filler
Puma VS M8 = A very good gun but M8 is a glass cannon and have exposed .50 so useless against infantry.
Only at level 15 of campaign you you can use a Sherman! Instead germans got Puma (with trollish hitboxes), PZ 3 N (a very good tank) and two PZ IV
Dude if i was searching for a simulative game or things like that i would rather to play ArmA III, Squad and so on, not an Arcade called Enlisted with poor balancing.
“The German players are often just more skilled blablabla gitting gud”
*Despite the nonsense in what you are saying, “gitting gud” is just the universal answer when someone don’t know what to say but he feel the need to. *
No point in giving you a true response lol
“Teammates not using brains is not a game´s fault.”
*You are kinda right, but meh. *
A lot of maps are german sided so people prefer to camp instead of rushing and die because of MG nest everywhere and camped tanks on the hills.
“No. With World War 2 games you just see German players having higher kill/death ratings. It’s an objective fact.”
Blatant nonsense
1 Like
Yeah, you could be right.
Here you go
2 Likes
When Murica actually starts to build rally points on the flanks or stop running around beach like headless chickens, or use snipers to take out MGs without walking all over them to give their position away, we can talk about the “german players more skilled is nonsense” statement (actually got higher level on allies than axis in Normandy).
Until then, that argument is objectively valid.
1 Like
“objectively” AHAHAHAHAHAHAH
How can you explain that during CBT testing almost nobody complained about allies being too weak and winrates were balanced between allies and axis? (They are balanced even now when allied team is somewhat competent.)
Despite CBT-OBT transition changed literally NOTHING on those maps?
I don´t like saying that, but “git gud” is actually a problem there. (of course there are problematic parts such as rockets of BF110 but even then allied teams often managed to win with solid spare spawnpoints)
1 Like
You got so mad only because i don’t agree with wath your are objectively saying.
It’s just because in the CBT Enlisted got less players than now. Less players, less opinions. That’s it.
This game is still in beta and balance will be done.
Don’t you like my opinion? Just do not comment on my topic or, at least, do not affert you got “objectively” things and FACTS. (which is quite absurd)
Well, my free time is ended. See ya all in-game.
what*
But I´m not mad at you… you are the only one here writing with disrespectful tone. I only dared to disagree and presented you my own experience during both closed and opened testing. Take it or leave it, that is up to you.
All I´m saying, is that it will take time until public learns what testers already did (and used to maximum). But that will take far more time than just a day or two. And overdosing with salt and then spitting it on forum is not going to help you with that either.
1 Like
Well, depends on a team if you team just bumrushes it never wins or tankers hug buildings that are filled with enemy. I killed today M8 crew with just pistol from one floor above =)
2 Likes
Well, maybe use smokes and write to game chat to team to do that too 
Be helpful and dont write angrily here.
1 Like