Celebrating the absence of a mad rush from point to point with no concern for tactics or casualties??
FFS - what sort of game do you want - something a bit REALISTIC??
3 Likes
Alhamdulillah…they finally bring back the assault mode for Moscow campaign, yea!
thank you for passing our suggestions to the devs keofox!
See you guys on the beach…
on a second thought, i just wish to not get 1 tapped through the dense fog,
or causing stability issue for low spec computers.
not my case, but you know.
it’s always best to think for everyone.
we’ll see about that tomorrow.
cheers.
2 Likes
You won’t see me
I’m more hyped about all those things they’ll add to Moscow
But if they add something unannounced to Normandy, see you on the battlefield
Side note: are we going to get Berlin as well?
Berlin and tunisia when?
I read today they’re getting Berlin ready? No word on Tunisa.
TBH I’m kinda over the Sovs & Germans and Yanks so a cup of tea in hte sand dunes of Africa would make a nice change 
One of the problems with the game is the lack of any actual campaign sense - it’s just a bunch of disconnected scenarios with no progression - you can’t actually “win” or “lose” Normandy or Moscow or Berlin.
Kind of hard to see how it could be different with a multi-player game… but right now I’m missing the sense of continuity a strategy game would give me.
But then it’s the same in WT and I manage that so perhaps I’ll get over it.
1 Like
Guess that would be generals mode in H&G
Not sure how well that would port over into Enlisted.
I would rather see sth like operations if BF1. So one battle leads to another.
Interesting idea right there meh, devs should take notes from this
Nah we should continue to ask for Operations/Enduring confrontation instead of the half baked dogshit generals/World War mode.
Neither of those latter things were fun at all. World War was pretty much DoA iirc
1 Like
Всем привет!!!
I just want objectives to count for something in air RB rather than the battles being glorified TDM.
1 Like
Very nice