New Meta: Q&A

[_Movmav]

@Veekay45

I didn’t know the forum restricted users to only communicating in one language subsection.

Fine, I guess.

It’s not restricted, but to me, it seems strange that you are expecting an answer to the same question in two languages.
When you come to a store and meet a fellow shopkeeper who knows both Russian and English, do you ask him every question in both languages? And do you expect an answer from him in two languages too?

[_fi_nal]

@gromvoiny

The new matchmaking isn’t about historical accuracy, but about balance of power.
So, for example, although MP 3008 is a last ditch effort late war SMG, it’s a “low-tier” weapon under the new system and you won’t often get matches in Berlin or Normandy when using the squad equipped with it.

Not great tbh.

[Shiivex]

Do we keep mkb on engineers from Stalingrad???

If it’s on op I completly miss it

[Adamnpee]

@Liah_Kim

because I want it high BR

You can just take IS-1 squad with mosin squad simultaneously.

[Myrm1don]

Yes its in post. You keep

[Serpiko82]

YES, squads from Stalingrad keep assault engineers.

[Liah_Kim]

No, I want it to play as high BR weapon.
Or you can get MP3008 with Tiger II and have “historical accuracy”

[James_Grove]

@ChuchaDrucha

Q. In Stalingrad, engineers could use assault rifles. What happens to this mechanic?

A. Such squads will not change and will be transferred with the same mechanics. But the heavy weapons’ stamina drain while aiming (a feature of Stalingrad) will be removed.

Answered here с:

[Adamnpee]

@Liah_Kim

Or you can get MP3008 with Tiger II and have “historical accuracy”

That wasn’t my problem. Problem was that it could get into battle with early war equipment just by itself (where it doesn’t belong to). but nice try, troll.

[W4rPig]

So even less space for those who have a lot of premium squads. Sweet.

[Veekay45]

I would appreciate an answer at least in either of the languages but I still haven’t got it:

@Veekay45

• Moroccans in Pacific yes or no?
• MKB on Moscow maps yes or no? (we don’t have campaigns now so there is no need to use Moscow maps for MKB)
• T-26 vs Semovente in Berlin yes or no? (will Berlin maps be tied to high BR stuff or “anything goes”?)

[lCebsl]

But what about Gold Order guns buying limit?

[Myrm1don]

Having played warthunder it checks out that power rating trumps time period. I expected this

[gromvoiny]

@Veekay45

I didn’t know the forum restricted users to only communicating in one language subsection.

Fine, I guess.

@gromvoiny

The new matchmaking isn’t about historical accuracy, but about balance of power

Thanks, but some of my questions are still unanswered:

• Moroccans in Pacific yes or no?
• MKB on Moscow maps yes or no? (we don’t have campaigns now so there is no need to use Moscow maps for MKB)
• T-26 vs Semovente in Berlin yes or no? (will Berlin maps be tied to high BR stuff or “anything goes”?)

1. The only rule is that USA squads can’t be above certain level to get matched against Japan on the Pacific maps. Since there’s no GB as a separate nation, it’s technically possible.
2. It will depend on power rating the MKB gets. If it’s a hightier weapon, then it will be a rare sight in Moscow.
3. As in example above, it won’t happen unless there’s too few people in the matchmaking pool, like already explained about this “soft rule” mechanic.

[Liah_Kim]

@Adamnpee

Problem was that it could get into battle with early war equipment

It is not a problem, at least for me

[ForlorN]

It can as far as I heard. Low level BR equipment only is possible in Berlin

[Veekay45]

@gromvoiny

So, for example, although MP 3008 is a last ditch effort late war SMG, it’s a “low-tier” weapon under the new system and you won’t often get matches in Berlin or Normandy when using the squad equipped with it.

Exactly this:

@Adamnpee

Wouldn’t be better just increase its stats and bring it to berlin BR?

Why not make it comparable with PPS-42 (MP 3008 is still a 7,63mm SMG, it still hurts, basically a Sten copy, and lock it to Berlin?)

Also

@gromvoiny

The new matchmaking isn’t about historical accuracy

Saddest sentence I’ve heard in a while
Look where we got from “The weaponry, soldier’s uniform, appearance and capabilities of the vehicles in the game are in line with historical facts”

[Astulian]

Is it squad itself or individual soldiers who will keep access to AR’s? If I buy 60 stalingrad engies, can I use 10 full engie squads with AR’s,
or will I be able to place an engineer from Berlin in a squad from Stalingrad who will be able to use MKb42 now?
Can he use, say, STG-44 as well?

[_Movmav]

@Veekay45

Moroccans in Pacific: yes or no?

Most likely, they will get less colorful uniforms for other timelines. It is still being discussed. But as a squad, because they are part of the allied army, they may be encountered in the Pacific.

@Veekay45

MKB on Moscow maps yes or no?

It is possible.

@Veekay45

T-26 vs Semovente in Berlin yes or no?

It is possible too. Less likely than high-BR Berlin, but still.

[Adamnpee]

@Liah_Kim

It is not a problem

Yeah, I never said it’s super unbearable problem I just suggested solution that works better for me/makes more sense to me.

I really dont understand your overdramatic reaction. You could just say that you disagree.