New Meta: Q&A

No, because to use a gold order vehicle you still need to research it in campaign.

No, it’s not. Though engineer Fedorov squads could be somewhat problematic.
If it’s possible I’ll use them just for the Sturmpioneer larp and to work some StGs into a setup that will otherwise be flooded with FG-42 IIs

By your logic, the Fedorov should have very low BR as to be in early war only, thus in Moscow and not in Berlin…

mmmh. What could go wrong there.

6 Likes

one of the reasons we asking for slots for premium squads or more slots on lineup.

.

3 Likes

me.

and their premiums :

Summary



because g41 is just, amazing. so much fun to play with
people think its bad just because of the reload,… reload isnt even an issue for me anymore when i use it (should be fixed still tho)

3 Likes

Good, looking foward to play on new system.

i m just somehow a litle disappointed we wont have more than 10 slots to fit the squads. and or unique slots just for premium squads… something we payed for.

2 Likes

I am also a special kid that likes g41. Feels nice, sounds nice

2 Likes

G41 deserves a litle more respect from the player base :slight_smile:

1 Like

much diff between it and the 43?, which i like using :smiley:

1 Like

It is more reasonable to see Fedorov in late war compare to see MP3008 in early war, so Fedorov may be given a high BR to only appear in late war, and MP3008 may be just removed from the main techtree.

Also Fedorov and AVT-40 was given to army as fire support like BAR in the US army when DP-27 is not enough, and they did not acutely preform that well. However, they got crazily controlable in game, because Recoil Control Multiplier which is a result of unnotified balance change, so anther solution is rework the recoil control mechanic and give them as low BR machinegun which is how they did in 1941-1942.

1 Like

g43 is better .

there are plenty of rifles better ingame , in comparison to g41.

its just, fun to play with. and does the job :slight_smile:

2 Likes

G41 is amazing and I love it too.

But tell me you didn’t buy 100 regular ones :laughing:

1 Like

There’s no reason to remove anything from the tech trees.

Enlisted, no longer follows any semblance of realism, historically wise, with the merging of everything and BR implementation…

So we shouldn’t expect Volks weaponry to get removed. Which is good, cause I like using the rifle and even the pipe smgs.

lol ofc not x)

i have alot of them, but not 100 :stuck_out_tongue: one day tho… one day i will :smiley:

2 Likes

Althought…

I guess It’s not that different from me and my last mannlicher m93 shopping spree :sweat_smile:

But you reminded me I should buy at least around 15 to 20 g41 as well ( I like it a lot too)… to add to those I already got :stuck_out_tongue:

1 Like

Than that become a difficult question, but there is definitely not a “yes or no” answer. I would not waste time on this question about future of Enlisted which even developers may not know. What I can do is just provide some suggestion if they may have similar goal with me and are looking for ideas, but their major direction is certainly out of my control.

1 Like

didnt know g41 didnt have that much respect since it pretty unique in it own right

The day you can reload him withaut see every time 4s of reloading animation after fired one single bullet, same for type 4 and jhonson rifle

1 Like

Yeah, that is also good, fedorovs could get some balance (nerf) to be not to OP in the early maps, but anyway i like your suggestion about fedorovs too.

Other thing is that fedorovs already existed in 1945 but mp3008 not existed in 1941.
Fedorovs purely theoretically could be used in berlin but mp3008 couldnt be used in moscow because they not existed yet but thats not the point.
As you said fedorovs should have low BR to be only in early maps and as I said mp3008 should have high BR to be matched in berlin maps

2 Likes

@Conscript_Joe was sarcastic, just to point it out