What do you think - will there be a new content for grind in future ?
I think that tech-tree is still not complete. Lack of IS-3, Me 262… lack of good attacker plane for Japan.
New content can save the game 
1 Like
New fluff? No, what would save this game, is fixing the problems that exist right now.
10 Likes
To be fair that new “goodies” will not save this game. What we need is better AI for your squad, Bug fixes, Lmg bibods, some map changes and most of all Match maker.
And hopefully it never will 
I know I say this every once in a while but it begs repeating the shear amount of content this game has and the potential it has for sooooooo much more. So many weapons, vehicles, planes, variants. Anything and everything
1 Like
Why are you asking such question? It is not like dev already stopped adding stuff in tech tree.
hahahahahaha
Youre so funny!
1 Like
Not quite the end all be all. They also need to change the br queues to line with the time periods as well as a good chunk of the weapon br’s.
I hope that we would get the following:
-
Stuh 42 and kv 2 to match with 105 sherman and chi ha short gun.
-
Br 2 semi auto for soviets as they are the only nation lacking one
-
Br 4 at launcher for US army to couter offenrohr and panzerfaust
-
Tech tree apcs that are actually armored and not just trucks
-
Br 5 japanese attack aircraft
-
Chi-ri for japanese Br 5 or br 4
-
Br 4 mg for japanese
-
Br 5 assault rifles for usa and japan
-
Br 3 semi auto sniper for germany and japan
More effective (and réal) planes /Guns / apc or tanks for all side (mainly Japan)
Rework the customisation (medic cross allow for all medics in all squads, for exemple)
- lot of all bugs to fix
Personally i hope they change the queues to where its 1 by itself(‘41-‘42) 2-3(‘42-late ‘43) and 4-5(44-45) and putting all the tier 4 and 5 weapons what saw service in the early phases of the war at br 2 and 3. At the same time 1 by itself giving the new players a space of their own.
I’m just sayin if BR was restructured “historical” then there would be no reason why we couldn’t just use the SVT 40, their standard semi auto. Just sayin
Well if the br would be historical every US player would get garands at the start. Svt 40 is way too good for br 2. It should be something with 5-6 rounds and bad dispersion
In the case of the br queues im talking about, the germans would also have gewehr 41’s, zh29’s, kiraly’s beretta38 (40 round)’s, mkb’s. even the E and H1 tiger to counter the t-34’s. This queue system would also offer room to add in leningrad, kursk, dneiper carpathian offensive and even aachen and bagration for instance.
Too rare. Most would be k98k
Never used by germans
Way too rare
Rare. K98k would be more common
Most of german tanks were panzer 3s and stugs. Tigers would be almost never seen
2 Likes
Pretty sure I read up on the first 4 in Leningrad being captured in Leningrad. Correct me if wrong.
Also, the rarer weapons I mentioned were those on the main progression systems in the campaigns.
Numbers mean nothing for videogames, we have one of a kind prototype AS-44 model 4 for all Soviet assaulters.
Yes but i thought we were talking about ha br queues so number do matter
Thats why personally i only worry about the time periods. I feel mistaken time periods are a bigger and more solvable mistake than making a rare weapon rare, though i do feel the as-44 and fedorov couldve been gold order weapons, maybe even all the mkb’s. But making rare weapons rare is not that big of a deal.
I think it’s just that we are coming from two different perspectives
Some people want 201% historical accuracy
I am more relative in that I recognize it’s a game and people will use whatever, all I care is at least everything works chronologically. I don’t care if you have some super rare prototype just as long as it appears where it belongs.
For example the first Tiger saw service in 1942 so that is where it will begin.