yeah, theres that left over WW 1 strategy. And then the germans go around it and drop behind it lol.
2 Likes
The White flag for France is a meme Since France say ââ NO ââ to the invasion of Irak, because US used false reasons.
this french bashing is a running gag Since 2003.
ââ les meilleurs blagues sont les plus courtesâ'.
ââ lâarmĂ©e invaincue ââ = french Mountain troop (Troupe de montagne, like ââ chasseurs alpins ââ), with 0 defeat into the Alpes and at Narvik.
The sacrifice at Dunkerk in order to Allow the English to run away (we call this ââ fuite Ă lâanglaise ââ)
Or Just read the history of ââ les cadets de Saumur ââ, the 13e DBLE, french RĂ©sistance, etc.
The problem wasnt the French Army (with Goods and heroicals fighters and good material ) , but some generals and a lot of politicians who didnât want this war. They were ââ pacifist ââ. Good soldiers lead by pacifists canât win a war.
And we can add the traumatism of the WW1 to explain the pacifism of some generals and politiciens.
6 Likes
Without commenting on the fairness of it, this started way before 2003. Like, way before I was born. Decades before 2003. Youâre just⊠wrong on this.
6 Likes
Honestly yeahâŠI never even heard/took notice of that. Was always ripping on the French from WW 2 before 2003 lol.
3 Likes
Before the 2nd gulf war, it was a ââ little jokeâ', little bit funny.
But after itâŠ
Might just be your view of it. I grew up in the 70âs and 80âs and this was a common theme. Again, nothing Iâm saying is fair or reasonable. Itâs just the anchor that France must carry.
1 Like
White Flag France was still far better than eco green woke France.
France bashing aside (
)
I would still love to see them added. I enjoyed them alot in Post Scriptum, and who doesnt want to clobber Panzers and Fritz in a Char B1 Bis
2 Likes
They need to be added as sub faction, otherwise it would let to unfair MM.
Because I like the idea of each faction having two opposing factions (once we get soviet vs japs).
1 Like
for sure. only interested in sub trees atm (no new factions). And Maps for different BRs. (like removing normandy from low BR and perhaps adding Marginot line )
1 Like
Yeah, Normandy shouldnât never be added to low BRs, especially since battle of bulge is somewhat considered as part of Normandy (which is extremely bizarre to me).
3 Likes
these tanks were terrible in reality because the commander was the gunner and loader at the same time which made the tank too slow to respond to threats, Panzers could drive around them like it was a practice.
hehe same can be said of t-34sâŠbut the short comings dont translate well into games. Char B1 Bis is a monster in games, just like the t-34 
2 Likes
The whole point of BR6 is BR decompression, and some rebalancing in lower BRâs should be includedâŠ
@TJLockie âtoo complicated and dumbâ âŠ
Itâs literally a basic BR±2 system, and itâs a simplification from WarThunderâs BR±3 system.
The current system is the weird and unintuitive one, with BRâ±2â for BR3 and the rest locked.
As i expected, the basic lock down everything âsolutionâ
3 stale queues, fighting themselves,⊠Eww.
BR3 will just die, and BR5 will be endless AR spam. Thereâs other games for thatâŠ
Yes, butchering the game is always simpleâŠ
1 Like
Completely meaningless, ±0 BR MM would be way better for decompression. And you donât need to add yet another BR level. With addition of BR6, the ultra toxic RNG in MM would stay. The game would never be properly balanced, just less unbalanced.
With ±0 MM things would be so easier to balance and decompressed more than enough.
Adding BR6 is maybe the worst suggestion I have heard in relation to MM.
2 Likes
News flash kiddo, BR 5 is already an assault rifle spam fest.
How will BR 3 die?? BR 3 and 4 are very similar same as BR 1 & 2. My way is balanced for new players, casual players and competitive players.
Your suggested system blends everything together in an unbalanced mush like pre merge enlisted. Itâs a mess and has no logic at all.
Itâs not, you have a bunch BR3 and BR4 players in the match, so itâs not 100% assault rifle spam fest.
And i donât even want a 100% assault rifle spam fest.
Your system is essentially merging BR1 w BR2 and BR3 w BR4. Show me a single person that will use the Gewehr 41 when the Gewehr 43 is at the same BR. Or the Panzer IV (with the long 75) over the Panther. Nobody will do that! i donât see much balance in locked systems like yours, i just see meta spam.
The whole point of a BR system is to blend âeverythingâ (not all) together in a balanced way. BR±2 can be balanced, you just have a problem with uptiers & downtiers.
How you see it like pre merge enlisted is beyond me,⊠itâs nothing alike.
It;s literally the basics of the BR system you see in other games, primarily vehicle fighting games.
How you see it as a âmess with no logic at allâ is your problem, not reality.
How, tell me how you see All of the Tigers at the same BR, or the IS1 and IS2, or the ARâs in the same BR with smgâs as a good thing. The only way to fix it is with BR decompression, aka BR6.
±0 BR MM would just lead to toxic spam of the meta stuff for that BR, with everything else being forgotten about. Having some âRNGâ in the MM is the only way to fix that, since now you donât have everybody toting the same meta things. And the game would still be balanced, unless you see the existence of uptiers & downtiers as a balance breaking game mechanic.
Only if you sacrifice to the devil queue times and the fun factor you have when you arenât stuck in a spamfest. Otherwise, you are forcing a spamfest meta with like half+ of the weapons been simply forgotten about just because they arenât strong versus the meta of your opponents.
oh boy, Im so glad I stopped arguing over pointless things on the forum.
Im saving much more time and getting so much less flak from other forum mates.
5 Likes
5 Likes