This would work if there were 100 times the player population than there is now.
If the matchmaking is divided this much with the current population, the game will be mostly in PVE mode.
2 Likes
So nothing would change, besides BR2 now also being able to face Panthers.
Great
1 Like
Could you maybe fix the reload mechanic of it before you remove it from the shop?
Itâs closed bolt but you still canât reload it for a +1 in the chamber. One of a few weapons where this is the case.
Not here for the portrait⊠But I will take that IS-2. It will look better with my last pfp. As for the other things, I would think on it. (I donât play japs and never will now)
Very much so.
Hi James, question are ideas being read by the devs or no? Another question, I could probably understand removing the gold order Beretta, but why remove the artillery Luger? I ask because thereâs a few players that donât think that this one should be removed from the game. Or better question why remove the gold order weapons at all just to add more gold order weapons? It simply doesnât make sense, could the devs at least tell us the players why?
I wonder if this is such a proposal, or if such a cool car for the USSR will definitely be enlisted?
@Adamnpee WHY??? You want to keep having BRâ5â face BR3??? You are ok with BR4 suffering without any opportunity to shine??? What about BR3 getting only full downtiers & uptiers with nothing in between???
Or you want to lock the BRâs down so they only face themselves???
I see alot of complaining about BR3âs position in the current matchmaker, but no solutions besides locking down everything, thus killing the game from stale gameplay and long queue times. I see almost NO complaints about the hald-assed implementation of a BR system (you drew it from WarThunder, but itâs nothing alike!) and the BRâ5â compression,âŠ
@SexyTent ⊠With this, the matchmaker will have ~3 options to place you in, and they are interlocked, so the current population is plenty for this. For example, if you queue in BR3, the matchmaker will place you in one of 3 battles: BR1-2-3, BR2-3-4 and BR3-4-5. That covers most of the BR range,⊠and the only thing that may increase queue times is BR6 (which will certainly increase them in the current system).
SO, i donât see how a proper BR±2 system will increase queue times. If anything, i expect them to decrease because the matchmaker will have more options for the BR range of the match that it will put you in.
@GeneralBrus No, because the BR decompression that BR6 will bring will allow the panther to go to BR5, alongside the TigerE (and TigerH1)âŠ
The whole point of BR6 is BR decompression, to seperate ARâs from smgâs and the big heavy tanks (Tiger II, IS 2, +) from their worse counterparts. With the King Tiger at BR6, and with BR4 able to fight BR2 sometimes, the Panther will certainly get raised to BR5 (itâs the best BR4 tank we have)
(although the Panther facing BR2 is better than the Tiger II(H) facing BR3, at least BR2 tanks can pen the sides of a Panther, while doing that to a King tiger with a BR3 sherman is gonna be way more difficultâŠ)
Well thats a completely different story then, you cant just claim that we need BR6 and every BR being ± 2 without explaining that you also want a BR level revamp.
Your system is too complicated and just downright dumb.
The system should be:
BR 1-2 (separate from 3)
BR 3-4 (seperate from 5)
BR 5 stand alone.
Itâs that simple.
4 Likes
I hope eventually the Germans would receive the Chatellerault as well since they used them as well after defeating France.
As someone else in this thread mentioned, I am very worried about the giving out of other Nations standard issue weaponry as a âBattle Passâ weapon. (same applies for standard issue equipment being premium)
Makes me feel like France as a subfaction is not even on the cards 
I mean we all joke about France waving the white flag of war, But they had a pretty impressive army at the time. And are not without Merrit. The English can thank them for fighting the rear guard so they could escape at Dunkirk.
This is a great pitty as France would be a fantastic Low BR focus, with interesting âpowerfulâ equipment and the maps to go with it.
3 Likes
Skins lol. Like most of the BP vehicles (other then few exceptions)
The French bore the brunt of WW1. They had a 70% casualty rate and that equates to 1.4M dead soldiers and 4.6M wounded soldiers. That says nothing of the civilian casualties. They lost an entire generation of fighting age men then just as things start to stabilize out 22 years later, the Germans were invading again. The entire country was extremely shell shocked.
1 Like
Yeah, it was pretty impressive theyâve achieved so little with such army.
2 Likes
And also what they achieved was due to Thier colonial army.
same old story isnt it. They had the gear, They had the 2nd or 3rd ( I think ) largest force in Europe, But hadnt moved on from WW 1 doctrine/strategy.
*honeslty thoughâŠadd them at low BR with their gear and players will no doubt re-write history lol
3 Likes
The French honour of dying in the trench so the nation can cash you as war reparations.
1 Like
Well, the French army was not motivated to fight in the war in the first place.
The famous French anti-war motto âwhy die for Danzig?â says it all, it was not concerning France itself just itâs interests and men were confident that the Maginot line would protect them.
1 Like
Why does this sound frighteningly actual?