I think its inevitable that we will have a MKB 42 for assaulters sooner rather than later
Yeeah - this game likes to pass thought stupid on the way to ludicrous…
2 Likes
Oh yes. We are in the 30 levels now so every german campaign will most likely end in every class getting a MKB/StG or a FG42 variant
Years?
Other stuff probably had bigger priority.
Mg42 should not be in Moscow at all.
If you give something to players you will get butchered for removing it later so I don’t agree with you on this.
You don’t do, or at least try not to, things like that. Good planning for future is key for good projects.
But opinions differ and mine is that we don’t need more Assault rifles in Moscow.
1 Like
Power creep brings money, so probably.
But as long as I play or have interest in this game I will say it is shit and should not be implemented.
1 Like
Y know what? Devs already have spoken several times about that “Historicaly Accurate” thing, They count them by years, not a month and that’s why there is a MKb in moscow, and Jumbo in normandy.
I cant understand your duplicity, Why is MKb a Fantasyland, when there is a Jumbo?
Duplicity? Am I speaking Klingon?
Did I ever say I am ok with Jumbo? Especially how retardedly it is balanced with only solid shot shells? I am not.
I am big advocate of lessening the grip around current campaigns so devs have more freedom for implementing new stuff. It is hard to put 40 levels of equipment if you are stuck in some narrow time period (aka Moscow or Normandy)
If campaigns are whole fronts in particular year (+/-) then Normandy is Liberation of France and drive into Germany. This in turn brings us that Jumbo is ok.
Same logic for Moscow ~ Barbarossa 1941, early 1942. Having whole whale quads equipped with MKb is shit. Are we playing cold war game or what? Having one or few of these guns trough Battle pass seasons as gold order prototype guns is fine by me.
But, game is going your way so you don’t need to worry.
1 Like
Well i suppose so
1 Like
I actually think they themselves don’t know what will they do in the future.
More campaigns will split the community even more. Is expanding current campaigns to whole fronts a right way to go? From Moscow to Stalingrad? Who knows, future will tell.
I am not saying my way is better or anything, I am too old to be that drastic. Some solution can be found to satisfy both populations.
Some kind of matchmaking according to guns used could maybe work. Or weight system. We could play the same campaign but never see each other. I will just equip my guys with historical loadouts and will never have to see full squads with Ak47-s and similar stuff.
Well, custom lobbies might help.
Tomorrow I’ll take a look how they work (because I haven’t done that yet) and I’ll probably make a sugestion about adding options for CL to make the game more historicall and more reslistic.
1 Like
Yeah, that could also work. And players themselves decide if this is what they are looking for or not. No need for the developers to get involved other than give us full customization options.
I took a look, no equipment customization for now.
1 Like