I guess they are just ±6 years outdated. But nobody really cares.
1 Like
I don’t think a game with jets, T-90s and Abrams can be considered a WW2 game.
3 Likes
considering that you will be playing for the most with ww2 tanks, i think it is.
And yet you will have Panthers in Stalingrad and Tunisia so it’s better according to you? I thought your flawed Map BR should be superior?
BR should be based on vehicles not weapons that way Moscow could still be played with PPSh-41 and MG42 Early in the mid/high BR as long as you don’t take those powerful tanks that were never there and you could que into Moscow.
I gotta play more with my Fedorov MG squad before they will take it away too from Moscow, what a waste of my money.
1 Like
BR should be mostly segregated by vehicles with 6 BR tiers, and weapons having 3 BR tiers. There are no point in taking away PPSh-41 from Moscow as long as you pick a tank from BR3-4 you should still play them along with BR2 weapon like PPSh-41.
4 Likes
The only reason you are so overdramatic about it is solely the fact you’ll be forced to face better stuff than just mkb42.
Stop putting words into my mouth, Fedorov MG is as op as actual Fedorov Avtomat and STG44 is nowhere near as powerful as those guns, i just hate Berlin maps i want more of Moscow. That’s all. I hate that devs decided to cut that campaign from the top tier BR map pool because they got lazy.
2 Likes
Moscow has so generic maps they all could be available for every BR. Stuff like this can be easily tweaked in future.
But certain maps should be available only for certain BR. Giving player to somehow influence the map he’ll be put on.
I do not want pure rng map pool
That’s what you will get if you play as the Axis across all BRs. And a mid BR Murricans in a new system where half of the matches will be grinding bots in Pacific and other half grinding Axis newbies or getting murdered by Axis veterans.
1 Like
You are acting like you know final version of new meta update which will be released live.
As far as I know, nothing has been stated definitely and things are still subject to change.
I still think “prefered map” system has potential.
I just don’t want RNG map pool. I think it’s terrible and I would probably do not bother to play this game anymore.
and war thunder is a dog shit game
6 Likes
I’m confused by the “quadro cult” thing I keep seeing referenced. My take is that he wants a sustainable game with some balance.
His videos are entertaining in contrast to virtually all other content creators.
That aside… what’s your point? Without a change, Enlisted goes away (or becomes so irrelevant that the difference is not worth arguing about). So, those of us who want to see it grow and succeed accept that this mean change. Time to get on board or go away.
2 Likes
In other words, any and everyone who follows Quadro will just follow what Quadro says without really forming an opinion of their own or thinking of other solutions. Like I always say, just merging the progression system will do the trick. Knowing when you unlock a gun in one campaign, means you can transfer it to the other campaigns that support that gun without having to unlock it in the campaign you want to transfer it in all over again. So take for instance you unlock the m1a1 Thompson in Tunisia and you don’t want to re-unlock it in Normandy all over again. Merging the progression system would allow that. You’d just have to unlock it in another campaign basically only to buy it or upgrade it in that other campaign. So merging the progression system only, is a simpler change than merging the campaigns. And the campaign system is the staple of this game. Matter of fact it’s the reason why other newer players want to play the game, as I’ve spoke to a lot of them.
3 Likes
Its just not the so called “Quadro cult” but instead there’s the “pro-merge cult” defending everything critical about the merge ignoring the warnings on what will be the consequences for the game with the merge by removing one of the main selling points of the game in the first place. Even the BR system is going to ruin the variety more and knowing Gaijin’s influence could just make the grind for the Thompson very steep once the merge happens which would be even worse to new players than grinding for the same gun 5 times at most.
Blindly supporting the merge without knowing or ignoring the potential problems of such system is not going to end as even Darkflow don’t even know what to do at this point.
4 Likes
I have never seen a single guy who’s like that but okay.
Quadro is just irrelevant clown with extremely toxic fanbase.
2 Likes
Yeah to be honest gaijin is just over complicating the system by trying the push a BR and tier system. If they want to do a merge so bad. Just merge the unlock system.
2 Likes
Wouldn’t solved the biggest issues game correctly has. For example too many queues which ends up creating Tunisia-like bot farm scenarios.
Reducing grind really isn’t the main reason behind merge.
Well Tunisia typically never has many players I guess because almost no one wants to grind for the beretta m38 all over again or unlock the First two Thompsons all over again neither. I’m betting on it. If merging the progression system happens instead of BR and tier system then you’d bring in players if that’s what gaijin wants. And even if our player base is small, Enlisted can afford to have a small playerbase because of the fact bots can take player spots unlike in Cod or battlefield, where those two games can’t afford to have small player bases. Enlisted can still function without many players unlike other games.
1 Like
That’s just pure speculation.
The idea that the BR and Tier system will fix everything is speculation as well tbh.
1 Like