Merge bad!

Mess Room
1

I unironically love playing this single-player Call of Duty: World at War-ish game on the winning sides and clapping bots/console players to relax. Furthermore, I do like to choose where I play: sometimes it’s fun to clap some bots in Moscow, and sometimes I feel like gaming in Berlin. Having little to no control over what maps you’ll play will ruin the vibe of the game. I don’t like what any of the tests looked like one bit and I think the way they’re going about the merge will revive the game short term but kill it long term, mark my words. Anyway, I’ll see yall in high-tier axis teams after the update drops to dunk on the allies.

P.S. Repair costs and other fun economy bleed mechanics WHEN??

14 Likes
2

I said months ago that the heydey of Enlisted was over, I’m just grateful for the time remaining until it’s all over.

The greatest analogy to DFs approach to development is this:

Imagine if you had a brain surgeon that used different tools every time they tried to do a surgery. It’d be a sh**show.

That’s exactly what DF are doing. No consistency, and too much micromanagement.

8 Likes
3

Blockquote P.S. Repair costs and other fun economy bleed mechanics WHEN??

The reasons I left WT and came to a campaign based realistic-ish game, now is becoming WT…
Next will be mixed battles like WT doh…
:kappa:

11 Likes
4

They don’t even know what they are doing with the BR system like some guns didn’t deserve an extremely high BR like PPD-40 and PPSh sharing same BR as assault rifles.

Imagine removing one of the main selling points of this game and turn it into another generic arcade military shooter besides copying War Thunder’s system despite existing alternatives.

3 Likes
5

and the avs not deserving of a tier 5 rating. More like a 4 or 3.

6

Console sucks.

7

A generic arcade shooter has working bipods.
I take that.

1 Like
8

Always lower the standards.

2 Likes
9

Sad state this thread is. Get a F’ing hold of yourselves!

What is the desire - a good game or a bot farm?

2 Likes
10

If Darkflow knows what they are doing, it will not come up to this but its clearly looking like they don’t know what they are doing and they already lost their way on the game resorting to lazy, halfassed methods to keep the playerbase somewhat engaged on paper but a double edged sword in reality.

10 Likes
12

I’m grinding now Moscow Axis, finished with Moscow Allies and all that work going to be waste of time since i won’t be able to play those high lvl unlocks on Moscow maps. BR segregation though maps is a horrible and pretty lazy idea.

4 Likes
13

yeah War thunder sucked to play even when winng

4 Likes
14

Agreed and most people don’t understand the game isn’t meant to be balanced but people kept complaining and the quadro cult had to throw a fit.

1 Like
15

I disagree pretty much with every opinion you have ever stated. So it’s no wonder I disagree with this one as well.

According to people like yourself:
Map segregations via campaigns - good
Map segregation via BR - Bad
RNG map - good.

1 Like
16

Im pretty sure the devs had in mind that the Germans had air superiority in 1945 and everyone equiped with FG42-IIs and Tiger 2s in Berlin.
Thats how it really was in Berlin 1945 snd Steiner was Volksheld.
A pity we still lost somehow, probably because the Allies kept ramming our tanks in greyzones.

17

You can’t have Tiger 2 in Stalingrad in a WW2 game.

That’s just barf enducing.

1 Like
18

war thunder has it though

19

That’s why I don’t play War Thunder.

3 Likes
20

War thunder has tiger vs pt-76 encounters on a daily bases as well.

1 Like
21

i know

but it is considered a ww2 game. isn’t it?

( “their” words + ratings, not mines )