well in clog you can clearly see client/server BR queues and there you only have 1-3 and 3-5 mentioned, as well as newbie 1-5 queue. can server match ±1 BR in background? yes. does it? not from what i have seen so far (but then again i have not been paying attention to it).
1 Like
Other games allow you to fill the entire team, COD and the like.
I love that you don’t read any of our posts, we agree on so many things but you refuse to consider reason when we propose it concerning this topic.
2 Likes
Man I love when you disregard what we’ve said previously
2 Likes
This whole topic is just stupid They should just let us have our comms and let us have stack versus stack instead of this stupid conversation and we should probably have even more players in the lobby like 15 or 20
2 Likes
He’s just a loner when this game is supposed to be about teamwork and there’s just so many brilliant mechanics which are just going to waste because of people like him.
2 Likes
If we had in match VC none of this would actually be a problem!
1 Like
True but people like Adam might start complaining about how voice coms or people working together is unfair and I can’t play my game and do whatever I want because people are actually working as a team.
1 Like
Well, Enlisted too. In customs :))
Btw. Says other games and proceeds to mention only COD.
All other examples clearly didn’t reflect the criterias which I have mentioned.
And I personally can’t verify COD, since I’ve never really played any modern one.
But I highly doubt you can create 10 men group in COD and go bully solo players in public random 10 vs 10 matches
here fixed that for you.
2 Likes
You don’t really need to fix anything I was gonna say that somewhere along the lines and some other topics
The same could be said of you…
🤷♂
I’ve not ignored anything you’ve said I’ve already rebuttaled it. Modern CODS allow you to run 6-12 people in public matches in 6v6 and 12v12 modes.
Sirge, Apex, Battlefield, Rocket League, CS, literally ANY team game is better WITH A TEAM OF FRIENDS. Other games have in game voice chat and allow you to fill the whole team! It’s like you’ve never played a team game before!
It would be a severe anti user practice, I like playing with 3 other friends. If I have too many people I have to go play another game!
I’ve mentioned these before and I’ll keep mentioning them again!
Against solo players??
And you are right, I truly havent played those mainstream Games like:
My favorite game genre is singleplayer heavily storybased rpgs.
But I highly doubt you can be the only 4 stack in the 10 vs 10 match in those games you have just mentioned.
And I don’t understand how…
…this would not be considered as playing with friends. My whole point is that 4 stacks are just toxic. And obviously there will never be enough of them in Enlisted, so they could have been put on both teams to counter each other.
This game has no resources nor big enough playerbase to support 4 stacks, deal with it. At current state, they’re extremely unhealthy for the game.
Stop defending it if you have any sense for Fairplay.
Stacks should either play only against other stacks (enjoy 30m queues) or the number of players in them should be reduced.
4 stacks should definitely not be allowed to play in matches with solo players.
I really don’t understand how anyone can think that’s okay.
You know them or they have clan tags simple had a game where I thought I was playing against a stack of 4 (clan tag) upon closer inspection it turned out it was not a 4 man stack but 8 man stack (knew the other guys)
It can happen in public match, too if you had 2 groups of 4 people so 8 person you could que at the same time and get in the same game. Having selected same server increases its chance (duh) but also playing a faction that’s unpopulated increases the chance of it significantly so technically speaking you can have 80 to 100 percent of lobby be your friends had a game like this enemy team was 8 man stack
Yeah, I know these practices of MajorMcDonald’s community.
It’s clearly nothing healthy for the game. But it’s completely unrelated to my point. This isn’t game’s intended feature.
Meanwhile 4 stacks are. And at the current state of the game, they are extremely toxic.
Yeah it’s abusing the loopholes and I agree fighting even a 4 man stack if you are solo can be hard not newer CoDs but older ones (particularly BO4 comes to mind) had a separate mode named mercenaries where you couldn’t que as a group only solo vs solo was allowed
I believe this game do not have enough resources to have similar game modes. It would just seperate enlisted’s not very big playerbase (and completely killing any point of the merge).
That’s why I believe stacks should be limited to only 2 or 3 players. To at least somehow reduce the toxicity for anyone else involved.
1 Like
As long as que at the same time exists this would be useless I know not many people know and use this but people that I know will abuse this however this would be a step in the right direction until they can get a proper stack vs stack system in game (which with player base might take years)
Well, it could be considered as an exploit and thus being punishable.
Even if this change is useless, the creating 4 stacks should not be officially supported. It’s just not healthy for 10 vs 10 matches. Especially when 4 stacks are pretty rare (meaning there aren’t enough of them to counter each other).
Literally anyone who has some sense of fairplay should support idea of reducing number of people in stacks.
From my perspective, anyone who’s currently supporting idea of 4 stacks. Just do not want fair and healthy gaming environment in Enlisted.
He just wants to dominate 24/7 in matches. And “playing with friends” is just dishonest cover up of his true intentions.
1 Like