There is no “removing” lmao.
You do understand you won’t use M2 Carbine in the Pacific anymore either, right?
Why not? It’s in the campaign tree now, and was added well after the merge was announced.
Japan will not have high enough BR weapons to fight against Shermans and M2 (at least for now)
Perhaps, but considering it’s in the campaign now, I would expect it to remain that way until proven otherwise.
There will be no “campaigns”.
The devs have confirmed that Japan will face US only with comparable BR weapons.
Similarly, I wouldn’t be surprised if e.g. Panzer IV F2 became too high to appear on Moscow maps and MKB became too high to appear in Stalingrad.
Do you really need someone explain this to you another time?
What number is? The 17th time already?..
…
…
…
Japanese equipment is to weak for take what allies can field at the same M2 BR, american can field drum thompson,jumbo,p47,m2,BRWM1919 ecc…
Japanese can field some mp28 copy always worse than the lanchester, some ligth tank and the worst figther in the game…
Until Japanese armory is not filled with sufficient equipment to make they spam the same firepower of american, they are BR locked to the low-mid american BR
Is there any reason for the attitude?
Unless the devs have stated otherwise, they have not confirmed which weapons will be allowed. So it’s only speculation. If we’re going with early war like everyone says, the stuff like the Thompson M21 and 50round is fair game.
If we’re going with low BR that still doesn’t make sense because there’s already many “high BR” weapons in the campaign already, so why can’t they still be used after the merge?
Hell, we don’t even know what BR will look like or what the tiers will be.
Yes i losted the time i replyed this exactly answer to you again and again and still you refuse to understand, so yes i start thinking there is something wrong at this point
They stated it 100 time now thath i losted the count of many time the poor james sayed it
No but they already said 100 time japanese are BR locked to play only aganaist early allied equipment, so…
No m2
No p47
No drum thompson
No jumbo
No p38
Ec…
Then please provide me the list of US weapons that will be allowed in the pacific, and we can stop having this discussion 100 times like you claim. If they’ve said it hundreds of times, it’s out there right?
You have to wait the progression devblog for the BR weapon list, in meantine go to check what helper already said on this matter, you can always open a topic
But i doubt the answer change from what i said already
I hope this is last time, seriusly dude
If you don’t have a list of weapons that will be allowed, or a list of weapon BR, then don’t lecture me on something that you don’t even know about.
So the rational thing to do here, is just assume all current campaign weapons will be allowed, plus some that rolled over to Tunisia. Because neither you nor me will know what it looks like.
What you said yada yada, just remember what i and the other already said wen the update come and dont get disappointed
I’m not going to be disappointed. I could care less if M2 carbine is removed. I’m just thinking rationally, and getting tired of people talking like they know exactly how BR will work. When none of us do.
Im repeating what helper said as Veekay45 already do
If helper said nothing, you have rigth to say this
But they said This
So i have the rigth to believe that is exactly how is writted here
“Japanese no sufficient firepower” so can play only aganaist low-Mid BR allies player until further armory expansion
And believe it or not M2 is already the counter of the FG so is certain a high-end BR gun
1 Like
Nah. Jumbo is def low BR tier. Ha Go only needs to aim for mg port and other one pixel of turret ring.
Yes, I saw that. That doesn’t explain BR tiers, that just gives a rough idea of what it’ll look like.
So do you know exactly what tier the M2 will be at? The Sherman? Drum Thompson? If the the answer is no, then all you can do is speculate.
Again, neither you or me knows exactly what qualifies as low to mid BR. I would consider stuff like the Johnson, BAR M1A1 and M1C sniper to be high BR but not only do I have no way of confirming that, I also see no reason why those weapons would be removed.
It’s pointless to argue about this when both you and me could very easily be wrong.
Nope. The M2 carbine is not equal to the FG42. The M2 carbine is an automatic carbine that functions like an SMG, while the FG42 is a battle rifle leaning towards LMG. They’re very different weapons. The problem is that they are allocated for riflemen, which is the only thing that makes them exceptionally strong.
I would agree with you that it probably shouldn’t be in the pacific yet, but it is. Which is why I don’t think US will be the pushover many people think it will be.
So MKB can go away from Stalingrad too, nice 
Sure, I don’t care. But the AVT needs to go too then.
Of course, I don’t care what equipment of other factions gets removed as well for balance together with MKB that was never there and too revolutionary to be there.
no they dont. most often authors are quoting some earlier source or book and everyone accepts it as a fact unless that source or book is proven wrong. there have been scientific studies that have all quoted one faulty research or books written on premise of accepting that research as a fact only to be proven wrong decades after when someone actually checked that original research.
book is usually taken as a credible if author has done his research and has written his source of information.
1 Like