Sure there can, hire few professors to investigate the matter for you.
After few years once theyr research is ready and it can with solid evidence prove it wasnt there you have your document.
Well im simply playing by your rules.
Good luck with that evidence.
Something was somewhere => there is evidence of that.
Something wasnāt somewhere => there is no evidence of that.
But obviously you couldnāt care less about history, you wan pew pew and shout āsoviet baddd, soviet biassā 
Ahem, your prove was some guy on utube saying it wasnt there.
I provided exactly same evidence, a guy saying it was there.
āBawwbaww QQ a random guy is no prove
(Unless ofc it supports my narrative)
Give dovument!!!ā
So lets see that document of yours.
I find that clown emote rather ironic.
You chose a game that is equally historical as my little pony ( there were horses & ponies in war )
And make suggestion based on historical accuracy?
Except itās going by tier, and not weapon. That means the MP3008 will become a more common sight in Tunisia than Berlin. And considering the MKb-42 (H) is a fairly mediocre weapon, you should expect to see it in lower BR campaigns, like Moscow, Stalingrad, and Tunisia.
No, there will be weapons native to each map/campaign, therefore:
The MP3008 will be a low BR weapon but will be more common in low BR Berlin games, and will increase your chances of getting in such games.
This is the soft rule added to balance the wishes of players who wanted sandbox games and/or historical accuracy.
The OP was asking for the MKB to no longer be native to Stalingrad or Moscow, so it can still appear there but it will not increase your chance of getting those maps.
Iām fairly certain that they said this is not the case, that weapons are broken up by tier and then campaigns are given a tier that will primarily matchmake there.
Pretty sure power rating is gonna trump time period.
Maps will probably follow time line, equipment not so much
Its why in warthunder you have korean war tanks and planes fighting WW 2 equipment. Hell theres even vehicles from 1979 chucked in with ww2 1943 vehicles
Pretty sure mp3008 gonna get similar treatment so it actually gets used
Thereās 2 parts. The rating system, and the historical soft rule. They are separate pieces of the matchmaking system that work together. The soft rule was added after the tier system following player feedback.
Correct, it will. The soft rule is exactly that, soft. It will only apply if there are enough players with accurate gear to place into a match. So the more players there are, the more accurate and better the rule becomes.
Hopefully wonāt be the case for Enlisted, or itās gonna be the end for me.
The soft rule adheres to the aforementioned weapon tiers, not individual weapons. So Volkssturm weapons will become a rare sight in Berlin, as they are low tier, and the lower tier campaigns will be Moscow, Stalingrad, and Tunisia.
No, sir. Hereās the devblog again.
So equipping an MP3008 is more likely to land you in an early war Berlin game.
Except it was later revealed in I think a helper post that the system is not as complex as some people were hoping, that the MP3008 is going to be more common in Tunisia than Berlin.
Which makes complete sense, with there being low-br early war weapons you werenāt going to be barred from Tunisia because someone on your team had a grease gun or MP3008, in all likelihood those players will have a mix of very early war garbage weapons and very late war garbage weapons. Youāre not going to get 10 people together that all have VG.1s and MP-3008s and nothing else equipped.
This is a soft rule who work only for non mixed BR battle, mixed BR battle pick a random common map for both faction and call it a day, dont expect a complex system because is not gonna happen until the game get sufficient battlezone for support it
Iāll believe it when I see it. Because itās not a complex system. Either weapons have a soft tie to the maps from the original campaign, or they donāt.
Either the MP3008 is more likely to appear in Berlin, or it isnāt.
Thereās no reasonable way that it could be complex, and thereās no in between. The soft rule either exists, or it doesnāt.
The way i understand it most likely to be.
Weapon tied to BR by power
Maps tied to BR by timeline (meaning moscow low br, Tunisia medium, berlin high
So if berlin is high BR map and mp3008 is low brā¦it wont see berlin unless softrule gets trumped or you up tier yourself
This is yet another example of the MKB story in Russia never mentioning anything from before Spring of 1943.
lmao really? If something wasnāt there, ā¦
Problem?
Letās make MKBās tier one higher than Stalingrad then?
There is no reason to have it there.
Thatās just speculation regarding MKBs BR and those map BRs.
Also ew.
Thatās why I donāt play WT. Would be a shame if the same happened with Enlisted.
I really really hope not. Itās gonna be the end of line for me if that happens.
I would love to see someone make piss poor attempt to balance AKs, M16s and G3s against freakin Mosins.
Where else would it go? The weapon primarily served on the Eastern Front, did it not?
The funny thing is, as it exists right now, the FG-42 II would still put all of those to shame.
Yes, it did, but after 1943 ā so whenever maps like Kursk, Bagration, Konigsberg, Budapest, Vienna are added, MKB can shine there.
For now it will make much more sense on Berlin and Normandy maps (where it at least existed among the troops already).
The devs wonāt remove a fan favourite gun just because there is one guy who wants bolt-action only.
I will still use the MKB42 in Stalingrad even after the update, but have twice as much joy shooting you with it.
