Ah yeah I saw that. That helps, but it’s not really a clear indication you know.
I’ll take your word for it until they say something though.
While to me it’s obvious that Ian is much more reputable than a random grandpa with no citations,
there is this very simple “burden of proof” concept – if MKBs were issued to the eastern front before spring 1943, feel free to provide the order.
He who says something happened should prove it, not vice versa.
You do understand that I’m talking about BRs here, right…? Not historical accuracy.
It’s confirmed that campaigns won’t stay as they are, so there is no reason why Stalingrad Campaign weapons will 1:1 appear on Stalingrad maps.
Then why do you even need a WW2 game? Play overwatch or fortnite or something for variety.
So every other captured weapon was documented, tested, studied, but MKBs were lost.
Because reasons. Sure.
May I ask what were ian’s citations ?
Except its your problem to prove as you are trying to say mkb wasnt in stalingrad.
Also source has been given, you havent provided any factual information why it would be false
information / source.
Exactly, feel free to provide evidence how this one source is false.
Then your argument makes even less sence since theres berlin guns that will receive so small BR that they will appear in all campaigns as starter weapons.
Or you could play game that actually aims for HA ?
Im fine with the current game regarding HA.
Or destroyed before capture or aliens took them. I dont give a fk not my problem to prove it wasnt there.
Then why tf you in this thread? lol
I clearly campaign for Stalingrad top BR to be 0.1 less than MKB 42.
Just go stroke it while you can now. Maybe time is ticking.
And I like to use weapons that were officially adopted by the respective militaries by the time said battles happened.
You of arguing this preference doesn’t make much sense, if any 
No problem, custom games.
Well considering its already decided that campaigns will be mixed regardless how much it hurts your immersive feelings its not like your entire topic makes any sense.
Considering devs clearly said MM will try to suit the map for weapons, there’s a lot to discuss regarding removing BS from maps via BR limits.
No problem, custom games.
Enjoy your Tiger IIs vs mechs in Pacific or any other perversion.
A soft rule, cba to explain it you may google it by yourself.
Matchmake will do just fine but thanks.
So? Soft rule is rule. Making MKB br = Stalingrad BR+0.1 will be sweet.
Yeah, if situation allows it will match equipment of said “campaign” against each other.
And only if situation allows hence soft rule balance > HA every given time.
So basicly, you can actually have this wet dream of yours. You just might have to search and quit game for few hundred times before you get your HA fantasy.
So no, not only does your silly ass idea alternate balance but it would also again split ques which was the reason of having new matchmake in first place aka reduce splitting.
Sure, in customs.
No. The game will try to match equipment to map.
MKb might be in Stalingrad campaign rn but that doesn’t mean it will be linked to the maps.
Were you dropped on your head as a kid, really?
The +0.1 BR will affect both factions.
Me waiting longer in the same queue = split queues…
You really were dropped at least twice, right?
Maybe I’ll go down there just to look at your “king tiger on moon guyz!!1 haha” 1/20 lobby
Quite sure they wont invidually give BR limits to maps as they have no plan to introduce BR limit at all except in pacific.
Cool, and what weapons that disqualifies from soviets ?
It might be quite surprise to you but you arent exactly the only player on this game.
Considering these suggestion of yours, you definitely should.
They literally said the game will try to find a map suiting your weapons – if that’s not map-to-BR-link, you tell me what it is.
Whatever is on the same level in Stalingrad, must be AVT.
So instead of keeping me in the queue for 1 minute longer, the game should put me into a dandom mixed battle and have me quit? What’s the logic in that
Good luck with girls und panzer on the moon customs.
A soft rule. Google it.
There will be no BR locks, except pacific.
AVS ? And rest of soviet fantasy assault rifles ?
Because fairly few is against the mixed battles.
And those who are, most likely are capable to spend that 1min in custom list to find game that suits theyr what ever the fk needs they have.
Thank god the matchmake will provide me that so no need for customs in that sense.
Google “try”.
Link =/= lock.
I have no idea what level it is on, if it’s the same level as MKB, it can go up BR just as well.
Source? Poll?
That’s exactly where girls und panzer on the moon lovers enjoy it.
Normal matchmaking is normal ww2. Perversions in customs. Makes perfect sense.
Its quite pointless to continue since the concept of soft rule is entirely something you cant comprehend.
Nor im not going to waste my time to explain it since I truely hope you are fully capable to search the Q&A about the subject yourself.
Especiatly since these matters have been already decided in previous Q&A topics.
Eitherway, custom games for your what ever HA fantasy needs.
Yet you are trying to essentially attemt at telling me “your preference bad, my preference good”.
This argument of yours was pointless from the start.
Quite sure that as well was your argument, rather than actually providing something that would prove otherwise.
Soft rule, pacific only BR locked, HA to customs all confirmed
“mimimimi stalinkrat”
You came to a thread “Make MKB-42 higher BR than Stalingrad after the Big Update” with “nooooo soviet biaz!!1” when I specifically said both factions would be cut off from mkb/avt
I would genuinely love to read your cool story about how the rule is not linked to map BR brackets
