Its mount weapon under “weapons” in controls. I remapped mine years ago…I feel like “B” was default
ok, thanks…
It’s literally displayed on your screen everytime you can mount a weapon.
You don’t even need to dig through settings.
It would be great if they would coppy BF5 bipod mechanics. (I was thinking about making such suggestion too.)
But I expect the game to be shut down before this happens.
4 Likes
Unless they plan to port enlisted into WT as infatry branch of the game. I doubt it happens any time soon. Cross out is much less popular game and they’re still keeping it alive.
More likely, the frequency and quality of updates will only decrease.
1 Like
well, i kinda did.
but only for the editor.
and even there people 
on it.
so… just like the S18 features, not a large portion like it.
because they rather still be in the arcady " type 97 " situation.
where you can do most of it unrealistically.
as in human nature, most are afraid of changes.
( or like AI improvements. we can’t have that. the community do not like the scary AI having half of a brain cell to get you. )
4 Likes
More like, they want to run and gun and are against everything else.
I saw this in BF, I see it here. Sad. We can’t have nice things.
1 Like
It’s not about change, it’s about fun vs not being fun.
The only thing I find to be fun with ATRs is sniping planes.
New approach to ATRs is simply not fun. Especially when you can always just run around with smgs instead.
I dont see the problem. They can still run and gun. It just gives those that want to use the bipod a viable choice
Im not suggesting a change so radical as forcing needing a bipod…just a bipod that works if chosen
2 Likes
Ah, I was thinking too far ahead.
1 Like
not even in the editor 
i’m sorry. but that’s very subjective to a very objective problem.
enlisted aimed to be realistic.
and there’s nothing realistic about being able to shoulder fire a 50kg+ anti tank rifle with no difficulties.
i for once, apreciate the attempt of porting a new mechanic onto anti tank rifles.
as it goes for planes… not really the anti tank rifle’s job.
which you could still technically do. but requires more effort.
with that being said, we don’t have to worry about that anymore either way.
Maybe 3 years ago. Now it’s too little too late.
2 Likes
Just so you understand. I don’t care if they eventually change all the ATRs so they can’t be used without bipods. I’ll just keep ignoring them.
It’s not like I’m shooting down planes with ATRs every other battle. I only have those event ATR squads in my BR1 lineups that are I rarely play. And that’s it.
But it is completely delusional to think that majority of people playing enlisted will be excited about similar changes.
You will just see even less ATRs on battlefield. And eventually people will demand AT launchers to be lowered to BR1.
If you think otherwise, you’re completely out of touch with the Enlisted community.
Maybe then devs would finally buff them. And maybe even buff against tanks this time!
But that would require giving them non-historical parameters. Which would be completely contradictory to what the few people advocating for these changes are saying.
Historically, those rifles have been horribly bad. And they were already an outdated concept before WW2.
And either the developers will respect that, or they can just make them fun to play with by respecting the pace and gameplay of Enlisted.
I guess?
But who cares? Certainly not devs. Not the first time, not the last time things don’t make sense and are against the “rules”.
Btw. I would personally prefer things to have unrealistic parameters.
Devs don’t mind it with aircraft, but somehow giving higher penetration values to japanese AT launchers is such a crime that is preferable to give Japanese ofenrohr instead. 
1 Like
Same. “Historical” argument only works between forum users, devs don’t give two fucks. So if it benefits the game, why not?
i do 
but i get the point.
it’s not about excitement. but common sense.
the same ones who couldn’t bear fanthom APCs in this game because " map too small ".
yet here we are. or… medics for that kind.
slippery slope type of argument.
there is always someone somewhere arguing for the crazy ideas.
should we listen to them constantly ? no.
br 1 launcher is a crazy idea. and anyone who suggests it, should feel bad.
it doesn’t really matter what i think or a bunch of lunatics thinks.
asking for realism in a game that started that way ( and for some reason occasionally pops up ) should perhaps be of priority.
i mean, the very idea of it as we speak is still present to an extent.
like this S18 anti tank rifle.
but i guess common sense doesn’t work on everyone.
Just wait.
I don’t think we’ll have to wait for long until stuff like sturmpistole or GrB 39 are lowered to BR1.
Gameplay should always be priority.