This good…
Source: Armor-Piercing Ammunition for Gun, 90-mm, M3, Office of the Chief of Ordnance, Washington, D.C., 1945.
Once my bug report which has been recently acknowledged regards to gaijins incorrect method of calculating non capped AP shell penetration gets implemented, it will be able to do exactly that to the Panther.
On the other hand, the M82 APCBC was completely unable to penetrate the Panther Upper Glacis. Why not?
This is the M82 APCBC penetrator marked by me in Blue
The Penetrator is 2.413 calibers in length which is 2.413 x 90mm shell diameter, so 217.17mm. It also has huge HE filler cavity further reducing the penetrator size
:::
This is the T33 APBC penetrator marked by me in Blue
The Penetrator is 2.780 calibers in length which is 2.780 x 90mm shell diameter, so 250.2mm. Has no HE filler cavity so the penetrator is at its full size
:::
The Bug Report
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/hLPH8HLThguu
Because gaijin calculates non capped AP rounds such as T33 AP(BC) incorrectly… the T33 APBC round currently is inferior to the M82 APCBC in terms of penetration in every single aspect and it currently is unable to penetrate Panther upper plate even at point blank range.
It also makes tanks like Chi-Nu suffer because it takes away its ability to penetrate the hull armour of the Sherman because its non capped AP is also incorrectly calculated. This is also why I have been making the “How good was its gun” series of posts to give players deeper understanding on realistic performance of certain Tank Guns.