M1918A1-A2 needs a buff, and the Soviet SMG needs a nerf

Now you have change to see balanse. lmg and smg have different strenghts now instead one being superior in every way.
Your ‘balance’ seems to be situation where one faction have best weapons in every situation

Thats difference between our views

Dont know what campaings you are playing but mayby you should level up a bit. In berlin axis later smg’s are really good

This isnt the first time smgs have been the subject.
Prior to lmg nerf peoples reasoning was theres no need to nerf over twice better soviet smg’s as the germans have lmgs that works just fine at cqc.
Now germans doesnt, so theres absolutely 0 reasons why the soviets over twice better smgs should not be nerfed to get some balance.

Knive is also good but doesnt magically justify the fact that soviet smgs are over twice better than the german ones.
And with that logic there was no need for entire lmg nerf either as all guns are “really good”

nope there were still people calling for soviet smg nerfs since berlin’s release to CBT which was 2 months before the LMG nerfs

1 Like

And what campaing are you refering? i assume moscow cause in berlin there isnt soviet smg thats twice as good as m38 or vg 1-5

Also mg34 is still good and best lmg in game.

Exept before nerf every smg was kinda obsolete cause lmg’s did everything better (cqb) while having superior range

or by your logic smg’s could be buffed to be better in every way, dealing more damage at longer ranges while being superior in cqb.

Numbers speaks quite highly against your argument.

Yet for some odd reason most soviets had the ppd/ppsh + rifle combo, before and after the lmg nerf.

For all I care sure, as long as they are balanced.

Trillions fly’s like smell of shit, so it must be best smell in this planet

And where you got that info? according germans soviet smg’s laser beam accurate so why they need that starter rifle and not backpack? whole argument smells just assumption

edit: just tested couple matches. mg34 with patronetroll mag is still deadliest weapon in campaing

2 Likes

For some odd reason I wouldnt be surprised at all if you took advices from flies. Or do you imply you are the fly as you are arguing against stats with your own experience ?

So everyone elses experiences with the game are assumptions / wrong ?
Yeah the only downside of the smg is the low dmg on long range, which you can relatively easily fix by using smg + rifle combo, which is pretty much a set that anyone with IQ over 2 would choose.

But you arguing against stats the numbers should be taken as a fact ? Really.

I’ve used LMG’s in CQC against entire bunched up squads, and they’re better now. The spread makes it where you aim in the middle of them, and start spraying. Within seconds you’ve wiped a squad.

They meant to nerf them, but they’ve accidentally buffed them in CQC :grin:

1 Like

True now on moscow the german player uses only lmg ist annoing and break the game wiew 6 player with normal and premiun mg squad the positive things if you play germans you win 8/10 (based on my victory with russia i lose 8 time in a row)