Lowering STUG III F into BR2 - What do Soviet and Allies think about that?

Both are Stuarts no?

No it 2 diffenrent tank

I don’t know about the Chaffee, but the M3 Lee is not reliable at all and doesn’t have much power.

50mm is huge for you?

T-70 is BR 1 and has 60mm of effective front armor but also angled to a large degree meaning shells have degraded stats for pen ontop of it.

2 Likes

For against br 1 with 37 mm yes

M3 lee is definitely better than Stug F. Maybe not so reliable against tanks (ammo without explosive filler), but it is brutal against infantry.

1 Like

Nonsense, M5 Stuart and T60 both will survive some Panzer IV F1 shots unless shooting weakspots like the turret cheeks of T60.

Non sense a pz4f1 easily one shot a M5A1

Not without effort - well hitting the T60 turret cheeks is far from difficult too, but my point here was that you have to aim where to shoot, which is what I mean when I say shooting weak spots.

Just look at BR1 Panzer III J, its 50mm flar armor on 90% of the hittable surface area. BR1 tanks do usually lack post pen damage, but everything above 50mm of pen that also has great explosive filler will usually one hit kill such tank no matter what (like T28E for example)

You sure about it?
I am very sure it don’t have it when campaign was still a thing.
Was the HEAT round added after the merge and been removed later?

I think it was back in 2021, when the test for the Tunisian campaign came out. And then the heat were removed not long after (I am not sure though, I did not play much at that time)

1 Like

Here is a footage from September 9 2021 just 1 day after release of Tunisia CBT. You can clearly see that it uses APCBC round.

1 Like

I see, that was just a guess tbh. Sorry.

I suppose that others could provide a more accurate insight on this.

There was extra stuff in CBT of tunisia

I remember the 30mm duck and 50 round thompson that got removed

…buut i dont remember testing the semovente :man_shrugging: