To MG slot.
To Assaulter slot and Soviets get nerfed PPD 34/38 at BR3. PS since when Assault rifle is MG? Soviet mains and their delusions.
We need to take away the live players from the Soviet side and arm all the bots with shovels. This will be the perfect balance.
They want total domination over Germany and turn them into bots but in global scale. They dream of Soviet wet dream where they will have BR5 weapons and tanks at BR2 so they could play their ideal PVE bot game with 10 real soviet players vs 10 german bots. That’s the future of the game if things are not going to change for Germany and devs won’t stop nerfing them and endless buffing Sov/USA.
I’ve already read something like this in this thread, but about German weapons.
Time to give Soviets ultimate tank at BR1. At BR2 they will be upgraded with 10x MG42 machineguns (stolen from Germans) and also attatched flakpanzer with bot shooting enemy planes
The bots will probably play better than the average Soviet player.
I agree. A bot with a shovel is too imba. Then the bots should be given shovel handles.
Imo MG34 and DP27 are quite comparable.
34 has less recoil but all other stats are in favor of DP. Both are around the sweetspot of rof for MGs which imo is about 700rpm.
eghhhhh . . . IMO - no.
“No” without a reason so without a value.
Later. Maybe.
we should also add 50% movement penalty, 3-5x horizontal recoil and 2x vertical recoil to soviet SMG to make them equal to german MG. that way smg will still have advantage in magazine size and mg in dispersion.
cause i dont remember stats for all thompsons variants. but if you want my opinion:
- m1- no. it is comparable with kiraly(both have advantages and disadvantages). if you drop kiraly to BR3 then yes, otherwise no.
- m21/28 - same as m1
- m1928a1 50 - perfectly ok if you also reduce mkb42 to BR4
- lanchester model 1 - cant say much about it(didnt use it). stat wise it is comparable to beretta m1918, but without visual penalty(which is major downside). it could be either BR2 or BR3. cant say without playing it.
- higher ROF m2 carbine… do you really think it should be on BR4. absolutely not.
. . . don’t need to read any further.
I am of the opinion that the Thompson 50 should be BR4 for the sole reason that Americans should get TT Thompson 100.
The kiraly has almost similar stats to it, the main difference is that the kiraly has 10 more bullets, and it is also much easier to aim with than the M1.
This weapon is very unique and should not be moved, with 1.7 reload time it will deal with anything.
you want to say it isnt?
m1 slightly higher damage, better damage dropoff, slightly better ROF, slightly better recoil and visual recoil
kiraly has better magazine, with slightly better reload with slightly better dispersion(although at these values both are almost equally bad)
recoil direction doesnt matter cause it is excellent for both guns.
i agree with this, but also think that germans need something comparable with higher capacity magazine on BR4. or they should get mkb42.
maybe because the title of the topic says it all?
If you don’t have enough germache to buff, create a separate theme.
also one other reason why not to lower smg BR. ffs stop with the power creep that makes all other weapons obsolete on lower BR.