HAHAHHA what do you take me for im in NATO
Latviaā¦
Im from the oldest city in Europe named after Alexander the Great father.
1 Like
Damm I wouldnāt have guessed that.
1 Like
Literally just talked about all the 3rd reich fantasy wet dream bullshit that goes on in this game for germany like endless fg42s (which is still the best SL in game) when it was like hitting the lottery to actually see one or use one in real life. The stinger is a limited event gun, similarly the conders is also a magic bullet hose. Ever notice how the conders just has like 8 bullets on a belt just dangling there but yet still shoots 100 bulletsā¦let your brain logic a bit before trying to say any nation has bias. The german faction has a ton of OP stuff in the game, like the 150mm tank that got placed in br2 (like what? It can frontally one shot is2 and super pershing lol). Itās okay for other factions to have a leg up here and there with specific things
1 Like
Well cant wait to add the IS-3 and T-44-100 and Jagdtiger and no more heavy tanks thats all we need to be honest.
This is the worst suggestion Iāve seen in a while. NOTHING can pen and destroy a jagdtiger that we have in game. No u.s. tank can do it, even is2 canāt do it. Germany already has the best tank in game. They donāt need an even more heavily armored tank. Completely throws balance right out the window with u.sā¦ if u.s. gets some bullshit to deal with it then so does japan. Not even sure if is3 can pen jagdtiger if the is2 cant.
2 Likes
Well you will enjoy the next update then
Yeah right. Keep enjoying your wet dream lol
2 Likes
2 Likes
the ussr was a country as much as the european union is or the roman empire was
2 Likes
Or the Holly Roman Empire
Germany is a country japan is a counrty
ussr, the british empire were just that empire look up the diffference
Well I think the British Empire lasted longer then USSR and the Third Reich they got 400 years 
All I want to say is that this discussion is pointless and internet arguments are a waste of time - or in other words I appreciate every last word here, nothing beats salty technical WW2 arguments.
1 Like
Well its just their logic since they are the first to call for realism when it suits them but in reality none of them is a weapon expert at best they are historiansā¦ so you cant make research by copy few books and call it a dayā¦
1 Like
Honest question, does rate of fire for mid capacity MGs even matter to the slightest? Dispersion is usually so bad that you miss most shots anyways - unless when deploying your bipod of course.
I own some Lathi and Knorr bremse MGs for BR2, and while both are old gold order guns, I really dont see much gameplay difference when on the move - however strangely enough on a bipod I actually prefer the Lathi because it has a much slower rate of fire - which will make me reload less frequently. Johnson MG, BAR, Type what ever Jap MG all have magazines instead of belts - low mag capacity means either the gun has above average dispersion for a MG, like the BAR for exampleā¦ or well the gun is generally not worth my time - no matter the BR.
The problem is with their quest for āārealismāā they are stacking everything on the same BR ā¦nerfing things that they have no solution how to balance I mean I dont really care about Johnson that much since US have no LMGs in BR IV but if we gonna put āārealismāā as a measure just look a ZB and I can go on. In reality many LMGs didnt had standard rate of fire they had rate of fire in between.
I dont know about that, WW2 was initially about hand made guns with each having slightly different attributes, but generally speaking mass produced guns like the MG42 had a set rate of fire of 1200 - with specific weapons having altered springs for specialised roles.
The idea that each and every gun was unique is not fitting for old ww2 guns.
the issue is not the johnson its the mg42 with 75 rounds it has to fight as a āpeerā