Worst offense is you equip a semi-auto and your opponent is spamming assault rifle or drum SMG lv 6-7… difference is to high
or flamer thrower 2s at lvl 8
Indeed 2 free flamethrowers and 1 premium at lv8 the BBQ level
Considering how significant the role of the PPSh is to the point that it appears in parades and other events related to WWII yeah. T-34-85 at a high level is already steep af too.
As you can see, in the tree of Japan several rifles, tanks and experimental weapons are missing, in addition to some motorcycle squads, although with the current maps the use of motorcycles is complex, the Japanese army had several and therefore, as I suggested in the forum (with historical photos to corroborate it) I think they should be added within the squad to add more strength to the nation
Is about performance, not service date. Otherwise Fed has to be level 0
weapons should be matched by their corresponding campaigns not by their performance so you dont have a situation like here where you can use mp3008 in moscow andlater and mkb42h only in late normalny early berlin, i do not like that table its weird, also mp40 stalingrad is also weird
If you have this, you let people face Federov Avtoms with MP28s.
Has this really taken 3 months?
Amazing output!!!
Well, I have an idea:
why do we must begin with the lowest br weapons and level-up following the time-line?
think of this:
- keep the br system which linked to the map
- give the br by the time-line: like, vg1-5 & vg2 & mp3008 =br 10, mosin & 98k & carcano…= their current br
and a new german player will start with vg1-5 in berlin, and join other campaign later by researching lower-br weapons, like mp40, while a new soviet player could start with mosin in moscow.
as for ppsh and fedorov, which are quite strong but also joined war early, we could give them low br, but with higher research exp requirements or/and additional unlock requirements, like, research serval other weapons. so that we could still see them in where they were appeared, and not to be a spam.
since the infantry weapon isn’t always better and better as the times goes, it is not so likely to be like what in warthunder, my idea is more likely to keep the current historical enviornment, and could also decrease the difficulties of the new comers just like you devs aimed to do. However, there won’t be a totally “banlance”, since it’s stay on the opposite side of the “historical”.
please don’t throw historical, which is one of your main feature away.
Would still be better than lvl 5 or 6… and semis 7 and 8…
It’s clear here, that devs listened to some testers who usually DON’T play with bolties, and mostly with smgs…
Why Italy and England not on their own?
Both italy and England have enough squads and weapons to be on their own. And while on their own they can play several campaigns/scenarios.
As Italy, you can play North Africa, russian front, south Europe scenarios.
As English (common wealth) you can play Normandy, North Africa, bruma.
So there’s plenty of possibilities.
Alas we have these nation on war thunder for same reasons and it works very well.
Why not on Enlisted as well?
I would love to see a Dev Blog saying:
Sorry, we messed up with Fedorov Avtomat.
It wasn’t that good at all, there’s a reason why it was a WW1 design and not produced during WW2.
Stats adjusted.
I agree with the placement of the VG 1-5, but I do disagree with the Beretta M1918 placement unless you make it realistic and make it semi auto.
…So if i see it right, can i hoard RP and basically get anything that comes later to the game?
Also how much XP does a tier 10 weapon/tank/aircraft cost?
don’t forget they listened to players that primary use WP and flamerthrowers
It’s more and more towards WT’s disgusting and well hated grinding system.
And in order to get late war sniper rifles/LMG, anything. You have to grind from the ground up. Not the most wanted branch system (where you can branch off from the main trunk and bypass things you dont want).
WTF?
Also, again, how well will you deal with so many squads? Still bind with their own weapons? The tank II is still here. And what about squad types? still bind with weapons?
Squad tiers still here. So you will have to grind through the weapon unlocks to get them.
And what is the IT means? What about existing other campaign’s Engineer I squads? Just gone?
It’s making things much more unclear than what we have now.
A huge chunk of deaths when I’m using my PPSh is not from MP40s, MGs or even Mkbs but instead its mostly from bolt action rifles. Some semi automatic rifles are so bad that you better grab a bolt action rifle instead.
I can understand some low lvl vehicles missing which i still don’t like (like the removal from both italian and british armored cars) but why the removal of the stuff like the jagdpanzers? i though one of the points of this update was the potential of adding more sidegrades and variety to the tech tree, so why remove the last free vehicle that was added for the germans (Panzer IV/70 (v))? because you don’t want to remove the premium?
So will troop types themselves have an inherent BR now?