balance or imbalance of fg42 vs avt40 doesnt matter. if they are unbalanced then they should be balanced on their own merit.
problem in this topic is that body armor(when paired with vitality) directly affects balance of weapons and it is only available for one nation. not to mention it is bought with separate currency that cant be earned normally (BP and events are not normal earning).
No. Iām not in a clan. I just play pretty well.
Yet defending wheelchair assists.
Good for you.
AVT has its benefits over FG for sure, but 5 less rounds are absolutely impactful. Heck 20 rounds for a auto gun are already tricky - which is the whole point why those select fire rifle deal more damage than assault rifles, but 15 rounds? Man you are empty fast.
No, itās not. T20 has 20 rounds and the same damage as AVT40
Perhaps you should learn to aim then.
AVT is 1hitkill to 60m even with vitality and has better dispersion.
?? When I say AVT has stats that make it better than FG in some aspects, why do you disagree by bringing up T20?
Donāt quite understand your logic here mate
The last time I checked, the FG42-2 also killed with one shot, and its rate of fire was 750 rounds per minute, which is 150 more than the AVt40.
There is only one thing that makes it better: damage.
and T20 is just an example. It has the same damage. But higher rate of fire. More ammo.
So, why is AVT 40 so bad? Just because?
not against vitality / body armor which kind of is the subject of the topic.
AVT how ever does.
Also dispersion.
And it doesnt fight against avt
I suppose the real question here is why fg is so bad
My comment was meant to be somewhat sarcastic since I donāt believe that the body armor for the Soviets is a big enough issue to complain about.
I donāt believe that all nations should be perfectly balanced: BORING! I also think that each nation should have something unique that the other nations donāt haveāin this case, itās the Soviet body armor.
Otherwise, how am I supposed to play against a weapon with a higher rate of fire? Just endure it? You didnāt think about this.
Also Actual Recoil , Visual Recoil, dispersion. 0,18 vs 0,22ā¦ a dramatic difference of 0.04
T20 has dispersion 0.20 Less Velocity, Less recoil. More ammo in the magazine. Higher rate of fire.
AVT doesnāt have this simply because.
both fighting against FG42-2
Dude, it does not, thatās my whole point
AVT TTK is 0
FG42 TTK is 0.08 so theres plenty of time for you to react.
Cant tell the differency between 1 or 2 hits but this differency you can tell 
Both, stats that you can affect by yourself by learning to play OR by joining to clan and becoming best of the best.
While ppl cant do anything about the massive 0.4 more dispersion FG has.
Both FG42 & T20 is 1hk against each other.
This is true in most cases.
yes yes, between 600 rounds per minute and 750 rounds per minute you can notice the difference too.
Thanks captain obvious. Why is this information needed?
Doesnt help FG the slightest since the avt is 0 TTK and FG is 0.08
It is indeed 0.4 more than AVT, thanks we knew it already.
I have no idea, since you brought the T20 to discussion that has absolutely nothing to do with the subject.
folks, arguing about dps with one hit kill guns is kinda ridiculous - especially when one of those doesnt kill in one shot.
again, this is more about how many Ai you can kill with one magazine
Sure, its enough to randomly throw a bullet off target ?
While you are moaning about ROF differency that doesnt help the fg42 the slightest.
AVT TTK in your 1on1 situation is still 0
FG 0.08
In 1second you can kill 10.83 with avt
In 1 second you can kill 6.25 with fg
