T34-100 is an event tank and not everyone else has it so you’re better off comparing the tech tree vehicles. Otherwise I’d say that the conders rivals the PPSH but I’m not gonna say that because gold order/event gear is less accessible than the tech tree. Still, T34-100 is only a slightly better IS2 but a glass cannon.
PZ 3 N HEAT rounds dominate BR 2 and still perform well at BR 3 so no clue what you’re talking about when you say it’s useless Soviets only have the T50 or T28 and both are sub par compared to the German BR 2 tanks.
KV1 isn’t as scary as you make it out to be, like I said, it dominates BR 2 but any BR 3 player with a long barrel can pen it no problem and it is out classed in an uptier.
Never said Russian aircraft was useless, just not as good as the German ones, but good job for being able to fly
Again your arguments are weak because not once did I mention German superiority I said that all factions across all BRs have their own strengths and weaknesses. But they’re not largely unbalanced for a good player to notice so cope harder. Soviet bias is just an excuse for people like you use when playing terrible or against a competent team.
As a warthunder player I never rated the Tiger… Its flat plate made it a pretty easy kill in most circumstances. Personally Love fighting against Tigers. Which is why I have always prefered the Panthers
But I have changed my Mind in Enlisted. For the Purposes of Enlisted the Tiger tank has better mobility, and better armor on the sides which makes it alot more resiliant to nearby explosions (detpacks and bombs)…
Panther is super strong from the front but weak as piss on the sides. Alot more vulnerable to bombs and explosives
Nah people don’t want to play a game of chess. They want to play a game about war. War isn’t balanced and can be unfair sometimes. Improvise, adapt and overcome. Otherwise this game ain’t for you. Body armour stays.
The body armor argument is really the most pathetic skill issue cope to exist, it matters so much that I only have one squad with armor.
Its kind of sad really, how it lives rent free in peoples minds as an excuse for losing while it sometimes adds a milisecond of life in such exact scenarios that make it completely unnoticeable in 95% of engagements.
I really do hope all armor effects are removed so these people cant fill the forums with such embarrassing takes.
It’s a GAME about war and war isn’t balanced. So therefore the game isn’t going to be 100% balanced. That would be straight up boring.
You’re acting like the Soviets need those weapons to do well but you’re completely ignoring the fedarov which is a great counterpart to the StG and PPSH which already dominates the SMG category can’t deny captured weapons when they were used extensively too.
cool… then like i said lets remove all prototypes and weapons that werent used in battle cause f balance. also lets remove obsolete weapons that werent used in ww2 and captured weapons cause we dont need balance.
so we would need to remove all SA and SF rifles from japan alongside ho ri and type 2/2a, t20 and m2 carbine from US, while soviets would need to remove fedorov, as44, rd44 and panzerfaust.
yet somehow US and germany also used captured weapons, but you dont see any german weapon in US TT, or soviet/US weapon in german TT(besides obrez and removed ppsh41 variants)
Although I somewhat agree with you about prototypes (I think they should be gold order/event) Prototypes are cool though, what other ww2 game is going to let you use them? They’re unique and add flavour to the game. They aren’t as crazy as call of duty vanguard or Woflenstein.
You’re wrong btw, Germany has heaps of captured weapons in the TT. They have many captured bolt actions and SMGs. I’m fine with captured weapons and would like to see more added to the other factions.
I’d be completely fine if Japan didn’t get their prototype gear, just as long as their BR was capped at BR 3.
You and a minority group are the only ones who have problems with prototypes. No point in crying about it because they’re only going to add more.
what exactly? only m/28 is strictly captured and it is for premium? french and czech guns fall under occupied/collaborator nations.
majority of the SMG are german and italian. minority are from collaborator/occupied nations. except ppsh41 variants of which only 1 is available for research(and of which no variant gets magical ppsh41 dispersion)
czech, polish and french weapons currently have no place in TT, so i dont have problem seeing them in axis TT cause they were occupied by germany and they had collaborators from those nations.
i dont have a problem with prototypes. i have problem with your argument where you are telling that war isnt balanced so we should leave armor in, but you are ok with bunch of prototype, obsolete and captured weapons being regular in TT that were added for balance. so we either have somewhat balanced games that includes all those weapons or we dont have balanced games and remove those weapons.
ok, then on the contrary, we give all factions any weapons and tanks, planes. Or make the characteristics of all weapons the same. All maps should be completely symmetrical. No historical maps. No unique tanks. There will be no unique weapons either. Everything will be the same.
Do you agree?
Also for Germany designate the FG-42 series to only paratroopers use as that what it was intended for and was never used by basic German soldiers
Also if we’re getting very historical cause we did get rid of protos then every German infantry should be armed with Kar98 for BR1-4 with some carrying G43 here and there and only in BR 5 should they start to fit infantry with STG44 but you know Russians also did have nine man squads armed with ppsh41 USA will just have M1 grands and some Thompsons here and there for there squads
Also it’s pretty know that M2 carbine did see combat at the end so I don’t know why we’re removing it
Well Yee true we got fulminated by them due lack coordination and experience and yes…
quick explanation: ( if You don’t want to read all the drama)
Is an obvious adventage no matter what if clans use it they have a good reason to, so no… Is not skill issue.
Long answer:
they we’re using the 10% damage reduction armor + vitality that only means that all the affirmations of the sov armor are true they do a impact into the Game which is obvious
No matter what ppl Say is not “skill issue”
We can engage 2 players in same conditions with same weapons both with vitality perk but one is using armor and the other not… who is gonna win? obviously the one who is using the armor because they can resist 1 shoot more than the one who not
Is obvious the adventage of the soviet armor no matter if ppl deny is always there, if clans use it they have a very good reason to
You can Say that is just 1 shoot but in short range engagements every milisend counts no matter what…
Low BR, Germany is strong. Particularly in BR2 which is the meaningful spot in low BR. USSR is fine too but Germany has very strong presence at low BR. It’s where i go when I want to chill.
Soviets only have the T50 or T28 and both are sub par compared to the German BR 2 tanks.
wierd…