Let the top 3 losers have the same rewards as the winners

But this is another problem. If the vehicle takes longer to reach the battlefield, it will also affect the scores of players who use the vehicle.It is not so easy for them to enter the top three.

With the current player imbalance no amount of matchmaker tweaks can make up the lack of axis players but an abundence of allied players. If 1000 allied players but only 50 axis players want to play a campain in a given hour there is no way to evenly distribute them all into fair matches. The closes thing to a fair matchmaker would just discard 950 allied players and only a chosen few allied players get to play a pvp game as pvp.

There just is no fixing the MM unless the MM would force people into sides they did not choose to be and have not leveled which would just cause them to desert instead (enlisted playerbase in a nutshell).

but people can abuse it too, i seen a lot of people troling by fully wiring the objective place so our team cant go inside and locked him inside, and i see some of them even use wire to block my rally, to make people use thier troll rally position, where the bot cant get out and thats how he get enginer badge

Tank camping is big problem and very unfair in campaigns like Tunisia where 1 guy can farm in Sherman II all match with no easy way to counter him.
Its natural that we dislike such behaviour, but after the merge, these issues should hopefully disappear with BR balanced equipment.

I don’t see why a talented pilot who clears the cap point of both enemies and fortifications would be less deserving.

2 Likes

No one ever said something like that but okay.

It seems you’re just trying to find imperfections in everything.

1 Like

That’s why I think that the “top 3” award in the losing team is not relative and does not enable your real actions in battle.

Here, for example, I found one of my older examples. Why should only the top three be awarded and not all?

1 Like

bruh, just like i said in my thread before, read it fully

No. I just think it’s stupid to reward the “top 3” players in the logic of the game mechanics to the losing team.

What is it? Poor mans satisfaction implementation?

1 Like

Completely unrelated to this topic. Rewarding players for selfish actions is completely different issue.
Create your own topic and come up with different values for certain actions.

Plus in majority of cases, top 3 players really does influenced the match in the moat significant way.

2 Likes

You didn’t get the real point so it’s kinda irrelevant what you think, sorry mate.

2 Likes

Well, that’s just your personal opinion. I understand that you want to be unique and say to yourself "I was a real leader in the losing team and I did a lot, we lost because a lot of players logged out, but I stayed, for that I deserve an extra candy, (as well as my two companions.)

I can’t be mad about it, but if it’s an open thread I’ll express my opinion too.

This man stupid thats all i can say, and its not personal opinion, almost all of people here agree too with rewarding, its you who have problem

1 Like

Just don’t get angry because it will be reflected in your arguments.

Ps. Most people who like it are people who take the style of this game too seriously. It’s not for nothing that I mentioned earlier in HLL where your actions and team effort are necessary to achieve victory.

We are talking about Enlisted, a casual arcade game.

Nope, I am just wasting time everytime I thrown into match thats objectively unwinnable.
1.5x multiplier is huge difference . And XPs are basically my own time.
I did buy lot of stuff to reduce grind time.
And it’s extremely frustrating when losers who did completely nothing has better multiplier becau RNG put them into better team. Even tho they did completely nothing to win.

You don’t know nothing, I do not care about pseudo ego stuff at all. I couldn’t care less.
Unlike yourself:

Because you didn’t get the point.

2 Likes

yeah he too dumb to get it

1 Like

He’s not dumb, he’s just ignorant.

He’s right about leaderboard points not reflecting real impact of players on match all the time. But that’s not problem of this topic. Its completely unrelated and can be changed in future pretty easily.

1 Like

Do you want to argue with insults? Can at least one of your arguments be taken seriously as of now dude?

lol dont get angry it will be reflected in your arguments.

Slava Ukraini!

Welcome to Enlisted.

Maybe it’s time to change the game if you’re so stressed? I’m not saying this meanly.