to be fair they shouldnt even ever meet.
4 Likes
No comment, that’s just funny.
4 Likes
I’m starting to thing likewise…
I was starting to miss your toxicity and the way you feel awkwardly (and cringey) superior.
If you’re not, then why tf you keep bringing this:
I’m talking about TANK vs TANK fights, as mentioned before several times, and don’t repeat the dumbass argument about this is not WT, because why tf do we have tanks in both sides? Maybe there should a tank in one side and the other team should focus on destroyin tanks with planes or tnt, or AT or detpacks. Keep coping with the fact that your point makes no sense,
Average 4 neuron-person answer.
Don’t even try to make him undertand, he’s far superior than all of us 
and thinks we’re crying for that.
2 Likes
I do agree with this. But the solution is to create more queues, which most likely happen in future.
But putting KV to BR4 just to constantly face panthers isn’t solution.
Currently, there’s still so many ways to kill KV with BR1/2 equipment.
3 Likes
You see? You haven’t read all the answers of this post? After talking about the problem more than one person has agreed upon creating a queue for BR III ONLY, where KV and Pz IV J can face each other without the ball breaking fact that a Big Cat can appear.
BTW, no one cries for “poor Germany”, AS I SAID before, this problem also affects soviets and Americans, when they find a dumbass using a gigachad tank.
3 Likes
It’s better that you don’t comment at all. Because every time you do it you expose yourself…
2 Likes
There are no only pure tank vs tank fights. Creating balance only based on one specific completely made up scenario is just pure nonsense.
Especially since tank gameplay isnt even the main thing in enlisted.
There can be only 2 tank at one time while your team is made of 10 players.
Your whole point is wrong.
But keep crying, KV will definitely not be moved to BR4. So you’ll have to wait for more queues.
But that will not be influenced by this post anyway.
3 Likes
it is kind of oddball tank, doesnt exactly fit anywhere.
Like in every BR, but as the history of jumbo, T34, KT2 has shown its not exactly fun to be forced to use alternative ways to deal with them.
1 Like
Damn man, is it so hard to understand that BR III tanks must have a separate queue???
There is no way for you to understand this!
3 Likes
It would fit BR3 perfectly if there was ±0 MM. And it would be okay in ±1 MM if marders, stugs with /L40-48 and so were BR2
In the end it will be that I will have to see the replays of certain characters around here, they must be those types of rats that I have alluded to above…
3 Likes
Btw. What surprise that BR 1-2 tank will more likely lose against BR3 tank.
I would never expected that. 
2 Likes
From everything I have read here, I can see that there are “people” (bots perhaps) who do not understand anything that is discussed here and only come to troll.
Brainless.
2 Likes
Isnt that just more proof that the KV should not see Br1 and 2 ? And Br 4 is justified to protect the low BR?
2 Likes
I can agree with this opinion.
Tanks are only one component of this game.
If we talk about the “balance” of the game as a whole, there is no point in limiting it to tanks vs. tanks.
I think the KV1 is a BR3, but I think the comparison is with the BR3 German tanks.
I used to love the Pnz IV F2 in Legacy Stalingrad and never had trouble with the KV.
1 Like
So Tiger 2 in Br 3 can be justified because planes and explosive pack exist?
3 Likes
That is exactly what is being discussed here. To fix this, we are suggesting that a special queue be created just for BR III.
3 Likes
Nobody is asking for that to be limited, what is being asked is for each BR to play against the equivalent. In other words, create a special queue for BR III. Do you understand?
2 Likes
Quite irrelevant since the history part has been ditched about decade ago.