ISU-152, M26 Pershing and IL-10

Yes Agree, we should buff german anti infantry and AA capability, that’s why we need planes with P47D payload and role versatility duh

1 Like

So with this logic allies dont need AT weapons either due to CAS ?

1 Like

Relying solely on a CAS is a bad idea.

Few days ago one idiot took a plane and was flying for a whole round without doing anything.

He blocked the plane slot and ended with only 1 kill.

Well theres detpacks & at mines :person_shrugging:

It will not work against grey-zone tank.

Neither does 30mm so I dont see issue here.
Use the rockets.

That is what I always do.

Fine, no tanks for murrica and no cas for german.

1 Like

I might be one of the few that Enjoys the Bf110 C-6 due to having HVAP. Or the Hurricane 40mm. I think they are lethal

I look forward to using them in more theatres post merge.

I love using cannons to destroy tanks. more satisfying than bombs.

We are losing the logical thread. Here we are not talking about German aviation (which is fine with the Dora D12, bombs and 30mm cannons), but about how to counter the Tiger 2 H, which is currently simply unattackable from the front by any American tank and clearly superior to Soviet tanks. I’m not saying that it can’t be destroyed (even the Tier 4 Beaufighter with 20 cannons and 8 rockets can do it), but to find a way to limit the spam of such a tank. Enlisted is not Warthunder; I find it right that the wagon is a resource that shifts the balance, but we need to find an effective counterpart. For the Americans it is obvious that it is the Pershing or SuperPershing, for the Russians beyond the ISU it could be the T34-100. I’m against IS3 because it would disrupt the game. I’m making a move in favor of merging: now they will be able to insert any vehicle without too much difficulty