Is this game fair?

[Exe_The_Lomax]

Wrong guy my dude. Im not even in this conversation.

[Serpiko82]

Thread title:

My expectations:

Actual thread:

[gastanofrizzi]

But you are not disappointed

[Serpiko82]

Indeed.

[MalazanFist]

This is a Gaijin game. the more we play AND PAY, the more we - as genuine - players. lose.
I do not mind paying for a game.
. They dont care, algorithms do. pay pay pay to win. Every match that is 1 sided? PAY TO WIN> this is a game choice, not random.

[Serpiko82]

I have no idea why you quote me specifically, but… I feel a very good vibe that you’ve got the potential to keep this thread going in the right direction.

[Exe_SweatyBoots]

The more money people give Gaijin and the more premium we take the more gamers lose, I agree. I don’t mind paying for a complete working title, or helping devs with a beta. But being asked to PAY the developer money to TEST THEIR GAME FOR THEM, that is some cuck energy for sure lmao

[Blogaugis]

Since the topic has been necro-ed…
My cents would be:
I doubt that the game truly reflects the specifics of weapons in real life.
It officially tries to claim so, but, I doubt it reflects it very accuratelly.
It probably is not 100% fair. World war 2 is still alive in some folks memories and is still considered rather controversial. And as with most Massive-Multiplayer games, it is likelly to change.
Biases of players and developers is not outside of consideration.

It is playable at least, though, and free to play - so there’s that.

EDIT: This is the topic about where some of us want the game to go towards:

I believe the game should lean towards realism

The game is already geared towards a war simulator filled with arcade elements but i believe this game would function and play better with more realism. Now before i get berated by people for calling this a war simulator, let me prove it to you: Delay in control imput just like Isonzo and Insurgency. And First Person only Vehicle cameras. But we should move towards more realistic elements such as: Bullet based damage. NO BULLET DEVIATION!!! A weight system like cuisine royale Longer ADS …

[Exe_SweatyBoots]

game is unplayable for free players, the pay to win and grey zone camping combine to make the game miserable, want to fly planes and use a tank in the same game to counter the wallet warrior? Drop money…want to bring 2 tanks into the battle without spending money on every single campaign you play? Too bad…every single tactic or counter that the pay to win defenders claim exists only is available if the free players happen to have that tactic equipped in that fight…meanwhile the pay to win players can bring every tank and plane and infantry squad tactic available and claim the game isnt pay to win…it is a joke and the game deserves the death it has gotten, if they remove pay to win and instead make the game pay to progress faster I can see the game making a turnaround, free players should be able to unlock vehicle/infantry slots as they progress thru the campaign, giving paid players a temporary shortcut advantage is already annoying enough and kills the fun in most players eyes, but giving paid players advantages the free players can NEVER earn? That is just scummy and predatory

[MalazanFist]

Necro to tha max.

just for the question/ It was my first query. keep it alive.

And no. Look at the dev.