Is T-3485 too OP as a starter tank?

And even more!

okay lets use aluminum foil as armor then, with the right angle it will deflect V2 rockets, are you serious?

In spoiler you can see the stat cards of two WWII shells, from War Thunder:

Summary

https://i-com.cdn.gaijin.net/monthly_2017_07/W_GR_5.png.16f7de93f99495ae0573cb09cd7a8495.png

As you can see, at any angle different than 90°, maximum penetration decreases. This means that, in order to resist a 180mm@90° shell, it is enough to reach an angle at which the increased LOS thickness exceeds the decreasing max pen.

This thing:

grafik

They where used in Berlin and liked by the Infantry during the urban fighting. If you want a more fair match up this thing seems an obvious choice. Maybe it´s a bit skewed to the Axis side but the T34-85 overcompensates for that.

1 Like

they could have gone with that vs Marder or Hetzer

Oof. Open-top 76mm SPG without turret or MG on T-60 chassis in Berlin…
If you want to screw the Soviets this hard, might as well just give them this:

image

1 Like

Well Axis don´t have a much better time with those Panzer IV J either. I mean the 85mm can reliably punch through any german tank easily from the front and has high OHK potential. It would make it fair in a sense that both factions have equally bad tanks until the second one.

i dont think it can even shoot above the wreck of t34 and tigers, i think its too short for that.

Could be an advantage too since it can retreat from an engagemeant by just driving behind one of the dozens of wrecks.

excluding the imposibilty to fast pick (not having a turret)

it can be killed by explosive, small arms fire, fire it also cant use the majorty of the usual protetected spot bc its too short yeah sure.

i prefer having a 76mm gun buildable than having an open top armored car with a “big” gun.

Come on man, the advantage Pz IV J would have over SU-76M is insane, much bigger than T-34/85 does over Pz IV J.

Ok then wait until you get the T34-85. Had to do the same thing for Axis with the Panther. Allies already have the better SMGs in a CQB campaign. I don´t think the Allies need a tank that can take on every Axis tank head on from the beginning and have a reasonable chance of winning.

It´s ok if the Soviets also have to do some grinding to get the good stuff. That´s been an Axis thing for far to long.

Germans don’t get an open-top SPG without a turret or MG, don’t be ridiculous.

I play both factions equally. T-34 is indeed better than Pz IV but not nearly as much as Pz IV would be better than SU-76.


btw the t34 is sooo fucking OP that ishit my pants and they all magically catch one fire, incredible isnt it?

I can post you the same picture, idiots getting wrecked is no proof of anything.

OP doesnt mean immortal, but I guess your not smart enough to know that.

Wow, good job mate. I see your preparing for enlisted esport majors. best of luck

Asymetrical Balancing

Me too but Asymetrical Balancing

SU-76 vs Pz IV is lamb slaughering, not balance.

Shooting the same spots which dont work and expect different results…
image
No wonder that the Axis in Berlin lose so much.
Its basically the law of nature. Survival of the fittest.

1 Like

So is the the P-47 being the best aircraft in the game but people call that asymetrical balancing so why not honestly