Historically speaking I would absolutely love to see the early T34 more often, and said armor quality multipliers could absolutely make it work.
Also about T28, it might be a big target, but its armor profile with its many turrets in the front make post pen damage inconsistent, which makes T28 E especially tanky.
These BRII tank except Crusader will have trouble when trying to pen the 80mm front plate.
But the PZIII turret shape is complex, will othen got some snail magic.
On the other hand, only Grant need HEAT shell to deal with.
Most of the BRII tank including T-50 canāt immune APCBC.
Hereās the thing, Enlisted and warthunder have the issue that rounds sometimes simply deal no damage, because of an enormous variety of factors, which in the end means that long reloading guns will always be unreliable to a certain degree, which in return means that fast firing guns are less forgiving.
So I think German 7.5 cm howitzers deserve a reload nerf, to bring them closer in line with its allied and soviet counterparts.
Dude the American counterpart of the 75mm howitzer has a less than 3 second potentially less than 2 second reload. Itās fine how it is
Wish I would see you specifically pointing out stuff that is too good for your main faction as well, but I do have the feeling I will never see this happen.
Hm i think you are quite right about that, personally I think however the Scott is much harder to fully utilise because of its very slow turret rotation speed.
Allied counter parts?
M8 Scott has 3.3s long reload speedā¦
Crusader III has 4s reload speedā¦
T-28E has 5s reload but with 2 turrets that work even when they are unmanned and are synched with the gunner tooā¦
Finally I want to add that these allied vehicles can easily deal with any BR3 Axis TT tank, but Panzer III N will greatly struggle against KV1s, M4A2 shermans and T-34s because its nerfed with BS dispersion that prevents you from hitting the weakspots and since Darkflow refused to III N the good Heat shells its penetration is way worse than the allied tanks I listed.
Panzer III N is literally in the same place on BR2 as the KV1 on BR3, its the king in down tier but will struggle frontally against higher BR tanks.
Well, Its interesting bringing this up, KV1 seems like the natural counter to anything.
No surprise there, KV-1 (L-11) has better armour than many BR4 tanks.
You forgot T-28 and itās Sharpnel shell
And most of the tank except T-28E donāt have enough after effect to kill PZIII N by few shot. Which greatly increases the possibility of PZIIINās counterattack.
Cries in no electric motor traverse till Sherman
PZIIINās role is just like KV1+M8 scott in BRII.
Fake, only a noob will not aim for the shot trap from that angle.
Again, this is because solid AP is useless in Enlisted.
All theyāre working on is sowing chaos on both sides of the forum. No constructive ideas, just grabbing at your pant leg, hoping youāll notice them. Donāt give them anything but a look of contempt.
I will argue this point however. I believe the M4A3 (105) is the superior infantry support vehicle as it not only has a bigger howitzer, but also muh fiddy which outclasses the MG 34 in usability (granted mainly because of BS overheat mechanics but still it swings that pendulum in my favor) and has the near impossible to realistically overheat M1919A4 for a coax. Add on the better armor of a Sherman and you got yourself one mean HE slinging machine. Lol
I guess this is a good point - Shermans are also quite amazing
But all in all, take it from the American first guy who thoroughly enjoys some BR II Germany, the Pz III N is perfectly fine as it is right now. Itās not OP. Itās not too weak. Itās perfectly solid
But hey, thereās the Stalingrad version of the Pz III N, where all the HE shells were swapped for HEAT rounds. Yeah, it doesnāt have side skirts, and not many players have this thing in their garage, but trust meāa HEAT shell with a super short reload? Thatās seriously OP!
Wait.
You started playing axis?! 
