This April 11th is finally an update of what players really like, rather than meaningless activities
1 Like
It’s hard to say. The next event might be even more embarrassing.
“How dare they add new equipment to the best BR range”
I just dont get it
1 Like
Cant say Im a fan of a Korean War extension, I mean thats just a needless stretch to the playerbase. WW1 seems more fitting, combine it with a melee overhaul update, not to mention you can still have the factions as is, instead of twisting the Japanese into a NK faction.
I think it would be better if it were added, to have it operate like the old campaigns by the fact it would simply sit apart from the WW2 part of the game and there is their own unique factions for it. That way you still get to reuse all the old assets without worrying about making the WW2 match making all wonky.
1 Like
Give it its late war HEAT shell, rebalance the shell counts and then it can easily move to BR 3. The 3N is well beyond a BR 2 tank.
Especially since most of the BR 4 US or Soviet tanks share their weak spots with the previous tier.
It would fit into BR 3 as well since you can pick between the 4J for anti armour or the 3N for HE spam.
No its not, the III N is cursed with dispersion so you will never hit an enemy tank’s hit weakspot so no HEAT shell will make it worthy of BR3 especially since HEAT has terrible post pen.
Its armour is just slightly better than the BR1 Pz III J, you want to put this tank against tanks with 100mm and great post pen, 60mm sloped armour…
But lets compare this to the BR2 competition:
hello Good eve Devs. I just wanted to ask and make sure if this is a bug or a feature on the squad I recently got from the LeadStorm
I
m excited cause I got the Para squad but theres something Ive noticed
Although it shows here that it requires 5 stars to unlock everything while trying to tweak the perks and it actually shows five stars or maxed out on every soldier but
it still puzzles me cause it locks me out and leveling them up to 5 stars is out of question, please tell if this is either a bug or a feature?
Restart your game, fixes it
4 Likes
Yes but you weren´t CRUSHED by a PPS43 in moscow. (Which makes no sense already) I just wonder how many u know what the devs needed to drink to add Su-9 into the game.
And the matchmaking is NOT fixed to this day. I can live with this shitty ahh merge but PLEASE DON´T RUIN THE GAME MORE:,(
True, I mentioned BI-1 earlier as the Suchoi Su-9 is from 1944, but it first flew in 1946!
And with the 45 bullet capacity in BI-1. When you destroyed the game with the merge, why wouldn´t you extend the capacity to for example 300 rounds? And also a sec. armament. It would be no problem to strap a 500kg bomb on the bottom of the BI-1 (It would still make much more sense than something from 1946). So why you are adding Su-9?
Yes you werent crushed by pps but you were crushed by ppsh 41, fedorov, avs and avt
True but it still had some his. accuracy. You must agree with that.
And it´s the same but it is in low tier.
The matchmaking indeed does have its own issues and i think -0+ is the best way to go. Still better than everything vs everything in the old campaigns
1 Like
Ik, but I am always talking about hist. accuracy.
No it didnt. Panzer 3b wasnt used after france, mp 28 was only for ss and police, ppd 34 was rare, federovs were all used in winter war, panzer 4f2 didnt exist etc. The old campaigns were never historical
It still made much more sense, because PPD actually existed in 1941-42 instead of PPS-43 (1943)
And this applies for every other thing with just some exceptions (Like you mentioned PzKpfw. IV F2)