I found a lot of players who dislike the conquest mode and want the select mode option.
I will make a poll with some ideas taken from other players and some of my own ideas.
The issue
As you know, Enlisted has two gamemodes (Conquest and Invasion)
These gamemodes are very different and it is hard to balance both gamemodes.
I have several ideas of balancing this:
Ideas
Separating gamemodes between lone fighters and squads
This idea is based on introducing more Invasion maps and making them squads-exclusive
while conquest maps should stay lone fighters-exclusive
By doing this, both gamemodes will be balanced separately and maps will be focussed on fitting one gamemode. For example: more arcade gameplay for lone fighters and less meatgrinder for squads
Giving the players choose gamemode option
By doing this, players will have options to choose the gamemode they want to play
Removing lone fighters and focussing on squads
Some players suggested it but I donât think people will agree with this because there are a lot of players who play lone fighters
Enlarging the maps for squads
Devs donât have to limit or remove anything. They can just make maps for squads bigger while keeping both gamemodes available
What do you want?
[poll type=regular results=always chartType=bar]
Iâm okay with the current system
I want ââenlarging maps for squadsââ
I want ââremoving lone fighters and focussing on squadsââ
I want ââadding choose gamemode optionââ
Other
I want ââseparating maps regarding gamemodesââ
[/poll]
Attention:
Comments is not a place to argue what is the best option
I donât like Conquest/Domination in any game. Itâs stupid and pointless running from A to B to C rinse repeat. Invasion style is much more exciting in my opinion.
I am mostly playing tanks and planes (and of course infantry when needed /dying) and this game mode feels like MMO side quest, run to this point kill every one wait few seconds to capture the point Repeat, no real progression in the battlefield just repeating on what you already did.
Itâs even worst in tanks since you need to get out of the tank to capture the pointâŚ
I think conquest needs to be changed, not thrown out. The problem comes when you market the game as ârealisticâ and then have massive objectives with green spraypaint around them and huge âAâ and âBâ hovering above them. Why are we reduced to this black and white gamemode when there is so many other ways to make realistic game modes. Imagine instead, there was a grid placed over the whole map, with small(ish) squares which change to your sides colour when you enter that square. Not only would each individual have much more impact on the battle, it rewards every type of playstyle. If you like flanking and sniping from the edge, you would still be helping your team hold ground. This would allow the entire map to be used rather than the unrealistic conquest game mode which lets be honest, is just terrible.
Obviously a very quick attempt, but you get the idea, ideally the boxes would be smaller. I have got to walk my dog then ill go into more detail. Also i couldnt find a Conquest map but the theory is the same.
I will propose again what I proposed in a similar thread a while ago.
Add the option to select the game mode between invasion or conquest, but in order to avoid one mode being played more than other, have a third option to randomly choose between all available game modes, and place a slightly higher exp reward for people who que up with the random option.
Or a daily reward. Or something similar.
That being said
I entirely agree with this sentiment. Conquest could be improved in modern ways to better represent what real warfare is like.
Iâm not a fan of the proposed grid system, but something similar, to make the frontline larger and make different fronts matter more.
(Side note: @73507743 Iâm starting to suspect youâre from poland, with all these polls youâre making.
At this point whenever I see a poll, I assume itâs made by you )
I absolutely despise domination mode for squads, as such I would be for separating it from them. Domination is just too generic meatgrinder unfit for squads.
Squads should have invasion and assault modes, while lone fighters should have domination.
The reason why I make polls is very simple:
You see, this Forum has about 1500 members. But only 1-3% of all those members make comments
So
This means that without polls, a person who comments the most can change the whole game by himself and devs wonât know if other payers will like it. For example: people were always against adding t-34 to Moscow and Panther to Normandy until the poll had proven otherwise.
Or when I suggested shielded Maxim, players were spiting on me in the comments for wanting a shield until I made a poll which had proven otherwise
I wanted to seperate conquest to be only for lone fighters but as you see, poll had proven otherwise
It can be said that poll is the best way of knowing what people ââactuallyââ want. If we had only ****posters and no polls, Devs will only know what me, Tcat, shrek and Voyo want but not what others want