Except flanking, as your behind-enemy-lines movements and position will be revealed by these captures.
True, this is one of the problems i was referring to.
I think that can be solved by having it be a spotting based system. As in, all the red boxes are uncontested and marked as such. The Green squares are US advances, that have been seen/spotted by the Germans, and vice versa. Not only would this make more realistic battlefields, it also means recon/spotters become really important to catch enemies sneak attacks.
So in your situation, the squares you held would be left as uncontested until you either were spotted or engaged.
All this is just ideas so not saying its perfect, would just be good to have discussion around this.
Thus not allowing you to actually cap them unless you are spotted?
Or would they still add to your teamās cap count, but the enemy wouldnt know which uncontested square would be contested?
They would still add to your teams bonus, giving people reason to go and recon areas that you suspect they might be getting their points from. Then as soon as you spot someone in a square, it reveals that it is captured or whatever
Polls are just hard to turn down. Everyone loves polls.
On topic- I would rather keep it as-is for the time being just because itās better variety that way, and invasion doesnāt always utilize maps well. Maybe once that 2-lane invasion gets ironed out it can change.
I wanna play Invasion instead of Conquest (Domination). Tired of server hopping every single day just for a good match. The EXP payout for Conquest just isnāt worth my time when Iām grinding for good weapons. Also Conquest isnāt fun.
3 Likes
This is the biggest issue
Conquest gives less XP, you die quicker, players who camp at cap point receive best rewards, spawncamping can happen often, maps are tiny and your squad always dies instantly by SMG fire
3 Likes