I wonder if they will separate the Italians from the Germans and the British from the Americans in the new game mechanics? it would be funny to run with some kind of carnaco in Moscow if not then my advice is do it. because when new companies are added we will get the battle for France 1941 then there were no TVM Americans sooner or later with the addition of new companies they must add new factions
1 Like
No, they are still merged with them wen the update drop, it probably take time before dev decide to separate them
1 Like
Hopefully theyāll never separate them, thereās literally no reason at all for it.
1 Like
OH BOY, HERE WE GO
???
Italy were actually involved in invation of USSR. They just need to make winter uniform for Itilian soldiers.
Summary
Come on, Adam is blatantly baiting for drama
1 Like
Riepilogo
Ah, lo skippato normalmente e una perdita di tempo leggere che scrive
Definitely not intentionally. But I guess its controversial opinion.
Hello, in current plans and answers from keofox, italians and british are part of german and usa techtree.
2 Likes
Actually, I donāt want it even in distant future.
Because if they will be as a subtree in Western allies, than you can make British / Australians / Americans only, but you can also make a combination of them.
If it will be separate tree, there either will be lots of ctrl C, ctrl V what new system is trying to avoid, or I wont be able to make British with Thompsons and Americans with SMLE, which will be terrible.
2 Likes
Exactly!
I would love to seeseperate branch for example British/Commonwealth in American tree. That would be great, but we really donāt need completely separated 10 faction trees. It would end up just messing up MM just like in WT, random faction allied in weird matter fighting on completely unrelated maps.
If small nations are kept as subranches to bigger ones, it will sometimes end up as (Italians defending Berlin) but it would be still better than complete nonsense or fighting against bot armies.
Itās all about compromises.
1 Like
If Italians would wear German uniform, why not?
And Iām sure, to get to the Berlin, you should have an StG in setup, so why not.
Moreover, if we will have modern weaponry at some point, we definitely need only 1 tree for NATO, not 5, like in WT
1 Like
Best option would be if skin presets were automatically assigned to certain weapons presetsb(for example - you are using baretta so youāll get Italian skin preset) and adequately to maps (for example - you are using baretta but you are on berlin map so youll end up as volksturm/ss guy). And skins presets of certain nations would have its voice.
And this would be all automatically done, only related how you prepare this presets in lobby (for example - all your Italians using smgs have this set of uniforms in dessert/summer/winter/town/wilderness)
It wouldnāt be messing up with MM and thatās most important.
I think it shouldnāt be impossible to implement.
So we can expect Italian Semovente in Berlin and British Crusader in the Pacific?
Fantastic game design 
2 Likes
Itās not problem to designed it in HA, but you would most likely end up playing completely against bot teams with still biased/unbiased factions as currently.
As I said, itās all about compromises.
No itās literally as simple as it gets: if Semovente selected = yes then map pool = Tunisia.
1 Like
Naive af. Merging would be completely pointless if this was the case. We could just keep campaign concept and playing against bots.
3 Likes
Can you seriously not count?
(A) splitting a playerbase into 12 queues and (B) matchmaking Semoventes with literally any and all āearly warā German and British + US gear users and putting them on a Tunisia map is the same for you?
1 Like
But thereās more equipments/vehicles that are pretty much unique for certain campaigns. Itās not about one tank and rest is magically okay, lol.