I wonder if they will separate the Italians from the Germans and the British from the Americans in the new game mechanics?

[Veekay45]

There’s not so many of them.
Simply if Tiger II then Hungary, Ardennes, Berlin maps and such, however more maps they decide to add.

[mergenthewise]

Faction map distribution is not that hard. Anachronistic weapons are bigger issue.
I am very sure we will see tiger 2s camping in stalingrad

Faction map distribution by mm

so devs clearly said we will not see japanese at normandy or something else. So if its possible to design mm to redirect factions to historical battleground. They can do something similar to this: [Adsız]

[Adamnpee]

@mergenthewise

Anachronistic weapons are bigger issue.

This

[SKWID22]

I don’t really care about separating tech trees, though that would be nice in the future. For now they should focus on making it so things from 1944 aren’t fighting things from 1941 halfway around the globe.

[mergenthewise]

I am not cbt tester or something but i just proposed a very basic mm and forwards compability idea about it.

Timeline filter work

Basically,i divide unlocks to early, mid and late war. This is very basic formula: you started the game and have early war stuff. You can play in any map ( not like red army in North africa btw) Any soviet player who just started the game can even see berlin maps, but using higher tier unlocks means you have to fight in maps in late war phase Phases : 1939-41 42-43 44-45 Lets say So yougave rd 44 to you lmg soldier, game will throw you to late war maps But a new beginner chose t-60, he …

[Dregomz]

@Veekay45

So we can expect Italian Semovente in Berlin and British Crusader in the Pacific?

Fantastic game design

My boys are ready to storm the Normandy and Guadalcanal

[mergenthewise]

Brits fough in pacific
Crusader in pacific maps like burma, malay, borneo or papua maps is not weird
But in maps like saipan and peleliu yeah that will be weird.

[Dregomz]

@Veekay45

No it’s literally as simple as it gets: if Semovente selected = yes then map pool = Tunisia.

You can’t just pick single vehicle and play, you need at least 4 squads and player could gather multiple f2p and gold weapons which have unknown BR so good luck balancing all of that. You could potentially be forced to play vs Sherman 76mm and Jumbo in your crappy Semovente and get one shotted every time by 76mm or not being able to pen Jumbo.

[Veekay45]

@Dregomz

You can’t just pick single vehicle and play, you need at least 4 squads and player could gather multiple f2p and gold weapons which have unknown BR so good luck balancing all of that.

We can’t know what BRs we’ll get but I guess if one takes K98, MP-28, ZB-26 and Tiger II, the highest BR is Tiger II so it’s Berlin.

[Adamnpee]

@Adamnpee

We could just keep campaign concept and playing against bots.

Yeah, I love current MM so much 10/10

[Barendd1974]

@Adamnpee

It’s not problem to designed it in HA, but you would most likely end up playing completely against bot teams with still biased/unbiased factions as currently.

Source needed.

@Adamnpee

As I said, it’s all about compromises.

I haven’t seen anyone in favor of this plan actually resort to a compromise. In fact, only the devs tried to compromise with the soft rule, despite it being a weak effort, yet people in favor of the plan were still against that at first.

[Adamnpee]

@Barendd1974

Source needed.

Just look on my previous screen

@Barendd1974

I haven’t seen anyone in favor of this plan actually resort to a compromise. In fact, only the devs tried to compromise with the soft rule, despite it being a weak effort, yet people in favor of the plan were still against that at first.

What?

[Barendd1974]

@Adamnpee

Just look on my previous screen

And how is that solely at fault for HA? It could be that you can’t select to queue for more than one campaign at the same time? Or simply the player retention is low due to it being harder and more tedious for new players to actually progress and compete without having to put money forth. An arbitrary limit to automatic weapons would help, costing more reinforcements to use, therefore being more powerful but leaving BA or Semi-autos as more prevalent.

Overall, there’s a lot of issues with the game that makes it more stressful.
Fire going through solid walls, fire setting you ablaze near instantly. You can’t really expect to win without using the meta weapons or end gear stuff.

Simply, it’s not HA at all that’s the issue. There’s just so many bugs, faulty systems, and poorly done areas in need of a revamp or just were half finished when implemented.

I mean, it’s literally a meme at this point that some bugs or some broken systems have been in for years, despite being pointed out.

Remember the HESCO Barriers (1980s equipment) in the Pacific when they first released? If people didn’t care, why were they changed after being mocked for months and Erika putting out a more accurate version?

[Adamnpee]

@Barendd1974

And how is that solely at fault for HA?

Can you quote me pls exactly the sentence in which I said something like this?

@Barendd1974

It could be that you can’t select to queue for more than one campaign at the same time?

I am quite sure they have datas on how many players are using “join any faction button” and I am pretty sure this wouldn’t significantly help. Otherwise they would already did this. You’ll be probably surprised, but it’s way easier to do queue for more campaign’s button than merge and complete rework of the game. But I know, you are the one with brain compared to devs.

@Barendd1974

Or simply the player retention is low due to it being harder and more tedious for new players to actually progress and compete without having to put money forth. An arbitrary limit to automatic weapons would help, costing more reinforcements to use, therefore being more powerful but leaving BA or Semi-autos as more prevalent.

If farming bots is something hard for you and you are blaming auto weapons for it, I have to laugh .

@Barendd1974

Overall, there’s a lot of issues with the game that makes it more stressful.

Yeah, maybe for tryhards who aren’t much skillfull. But enlisted is very casual game, so…

@Barendd1974

You can’t really expect to win without using the meta weapons or end gear stuff.

Nope, you can’t win without using rally points & in matches like 2 vs 6 real players but I guess keep crying about full autos is a way too.

@Barendd1974

Simply, it’s not HA at all that’s the issue.

Nobody ever said this #2 but here we go again.

@Barendd1974

There’s just so many bugs, faulty systems, and poorly done areas in need of a revamp or just were half finished when implemented.

I know game called warthunder. I think it has all these issues too. It’s unpopular? Nope.

@Barendd1974

I mean, it’s literally a meme at this point that some bugs or some broken systems have been in for years, despite being pointed out.

Yeah, flames and bipods. Those are issues, yes. But they’re overused in arguments like this, lol.

@Barendd1974

If people didn’t care

Nobody ever said this #3

@Barendd1974

why were they changed after being mocked for months and Erika putting out a more accurate version?

Probably because of consistent overdramatic shttstorm and the fact they did mistake.

[Barendd1974]

@Adamnpee

Can you quote me pls exactly the sentence in which I said something like this?

Rereading the original reply, yea I misread it. Just normally defensive about it since people on here do consider it the reason. My apologies.

@Adamnpee

I am quite sure they have datas on how many players are using “join any faction button” and I am pretty sure this wouldn’t significantly help. Otherwise they would already did this. You’ll be probably surprised, but it’s way easier to do queue for more campaign’s button than merge and complete rework of the game. But I know, you are the one with brain compared to devs.

I’m not claiming i’m more aware of the data compared to the devs, but the devs are also not omnipotent in what the playerbase wants. “Join Any Faction” is different then selecting multiple campaigns. It widens the selection of maps that people may enjoy and allows to level up more than one progression tree. There are already multiple people here on the forums that play Axis across the board through multiple campaigns, so it’s not too unbelievable that it would work better. Not to mention that people would also be able to get into a Japanese or a German game if they like both. The issue is that there was no incentive to click on the “Join Any Faction” button as most people have their side they like on the campaign, or mostly because the community picks the easier side since everyone is time limited with their day and would like to enjoy themselves rather than slog through what feels like a chore.

@Adamnpee

If farming bots is something hard for you and you are blaming auto weapons for it, I have to laugh

There’s no issue with farming bots. I usually get top of the leaderboard, so it’s not a skill issue if that’s what you’re implying. It’s to encourage more BA gameplay across all fronts. I would like to use BA more without having to resort to my same cycle of Assaulter, Tank, Engineer. Or even be able to use lower tier tanks to show off any cosmetics without the fear of the team underperforming because i’m focusing more on my own entertainment than winning.

@Adamnpee

Nope, you can’t win without using rally points & in matches like 2 vs 6 real players but I guess keep crying about full autos is a way too.

You don’t think that Federovs, Mkbs, StGs, PPsHs, FGs, etc. can kill squads way faster than BA rifles? Also, “issues” is plural, just because I used an example, does not mean that’s the only issue or solution.

@Adamnpee

I know game called warthunder. I think it has all these issues too. It’s unpopular? Nope.

Well, as far as i’m aware, it’s praised for it’s realism with vehicles, which is why it’s attracted a lot of military enthusiasts (some of whom leaked classified intel to improve the models). The gameplay in Enlisted is not too much different than other Arcade shooters.

@Adamnpee

Yeah, flames and bipods. Those are issues, yes. But they’re overused in arguments like this, lol.

They wouldn’t be overused if they were fixed? I mean, 2 years is a lot of time to fix a mechanic. Then again, it’s already taken 3 months to write a Q&A.

@Adamnpee

Probably because of consistent overdramatic shttstorm and the fact they did mistake

I don’t think it was a “mistake” I think they were just being lazy. Same reason why motorcycles aren’t fleshed throughout the other campaigns, why Tunisia still doesn’t have customization, and why they aren’t separating Italian and UK/Commonwealth with the launch of the next update.

[Myrm1don]

I will never understand how new players, noobs, even players that have been around for a while end a game with less than 20 kills (after 20-30 mins).

I thought having the Bot fodder was one of the genius parts about enlisted. Players of all types could feel awesome because they could get alot of kills…

On topic. I was initially disappointed that Britain wouldnt have their own tech tree (in warthunder frame of mind). Buuuuuut, when actually pausing to think… I actually agree. Its kinda better having them as sub trees in one Army. Allies. Can play how you want without separating player base. I like your style

Please add Romania, Hungary, Finnss, Polish, French, Canadians, ANZACS and whatever as sub trees (eventually)

[mergenthewise]

@Myrm1don

Players of all types could feel awesome because they could get alot of kills…

They must improve ai at some point.
It works both ways

[Myrm1don]

I was more getting at ai is dumb and easy to slaughter now. Unbelievable anyone can go 20-30 minutes and not accidentily kill more than 20 lol

I thought it was a great idea, just aparantly doesnt help them one bit.